MARC GARMAN - EDITOR

This e-mail address is being protected from spam bots, you need JavaScript enabled to view it

Syndicate

Login

PDF Print
 

 

Public Safety Committee Agrees to Disagree

 

 

July 25, 2012 Meeting


8/1/12

By Hatfield McCoy


For the last two meetings only one person has shown from the general public to speak at the community forum portion of the Ad Hoc Public Safety Committee. That speaker’s concerns surrounded the egregious situation of squatters in vacant, foreclosed homes. As so many have said before, the city council, and/or public safety departments should enforce an ordinance which would legally fine the banks. “We need a property regulation ordinance to be effective the minute a pre notice of default is issued. This city absolutely needs to become more responsive,” the speaker pleaded.

 

The very fact that only one speaker appeared inspired Committee member Tweedy to ask again that a public survey be distributed giving the general public an opportunity to tell the committee what changes they would like to see in public safety. In a similar vein, Committee member Karol Heppe asked that the meetings be taken out into the community. Heppe suggested that there could be a meeting held in a public place in the northern, southern, eastern and western districts of town. Further, with respect to the community forum, Committee member Beistel asked that the forum be placed later in the meeting, as opposed to the first portion of the meeting as it stands now. The committee as a whole rejected all three ideas. They politely agreed to disagree. There will be no public survey, the public forum will remain at the beginning of the meeting, and there will be no road show. All meetings will remain at City Hall council chambers at 555 Santa Clara St. in downtown Vallejo. (So get the word out and tell people to come down at 6:30 to make suggestions, expound upon complaints, or merely to compliment the committee members for their time and energy.)


The most recent meetings have mostly centered around the current practices in both the Vallejo police and fire departments. For example, the police stated that they are now using a brand new updated mobile device app. called Nixle. They have city-wide cameras in place which are monitored by volunteers at all times. The central police station lobby is now open Monday through Thursday 9:30a.m. to 5p.m. (These hours had been drastically reduced during the last three years due to the city’s bankruptcy---so things are looking up.) The police department is also in the process of reconfiguring their entire web page. The committee had many suggestions for the public to be able to better understand it. “Ask someone like me who is not that computer savvy to review it before it is finalized. We must make certain we can navigate it,” said Committee Chair Joanne Schivley. Committee member (Police Sergeant) Sid DeJesus offered the direct numbers for the records department if someone is looking for a police report:

(707) 648-4491 or 648-4447.


Between August 8th to the 20th the police department will be taking applications for their Citizen’s Academy volunteer program. If anyone is interested in volunteering, or knows someone who would be, call Officer Jeff Bassett at 648-4574 for an application or more information. Some of the duties include Citizens on Patrol, monitoring cameras, parade volunteers, traffic DUI stop checks, data entry, etc. Sgt. DeJesus also has given an overview of the Crime Free program through the Vallejo Housing Authority which proves very good for property managers in general. He further boasted that the department of police has recently received letters of commendation for the good work they are doing in conjunction with the other safety officers at Discovery Kingdom. Committee member DeJesus gave an overview of a recent three week period: 132 arrests, 5 armed robberies, 4 guns confiscated, 1 copper wire theft, 5 assaults with a deadly weapon, and 2 fatal incidents. He recommends that people call the non-emergency number at 552-3285 if you need police assistance, and the matter is not life threatening. Sgt. DeJesus also gave his private number: 648-4696 if anyone has questions or wants to file a formal complaint. (DeJesus is the Internal Affairs officer who initially reviews citizen’s complaints, and determines whether or not they should go to the District Attorney’s office.)


The Vallejo Fire Dept. has stated that they have just received a grant to update their rescue equipment. They are implementing an electronic patient care report, an electronic initial contact report all of which will save tremendous staff time. “There is more time involved in a fire than people realize,” Committee member & firefighter Pat Dunn said, “there is usually at least three hours after a fire which includes clean up, mop up, boarding up, and waiting to make absolutely certain the flames do not rekindle. All of that takes time and patience,” he continued. Dunn also gave an overview of the Emergency Medical Service. He said that in the year 2000 an EMS cooperative was formed. The VFD now has an exclusive agreement with Medic Ambulance. Once a call comes in the VFD has just seven minutes to get to the scene. Both the truck and ambulance is dispatched. The ambulance has 12 minutes within the city limits, and 15 minutes outside of the city limits. The budget for this is $670,000 per year. He explained that 28% of the calls are trauma calls, and 9% are crime related. All other calls fall into the category of general medical issues. Dunn further stated that of all of the seven cities in Solano County, Vallejo gets 48% of the calls.


With respect to training, there is an Incident Command System training which all medic ambulance staff must receive. They also provide community training such as CPR at the Senior Center, etc. They hold casualty drills from time to time such as earthquake drills they call: “Solano Shakes.” Furthermore, they have recently instituted automated external fibulators to help heart and respiratory patients. They hope to place them in strategic places throughout the city noting that the Vallejo Housing Authority would like to have one available in their offices.


As noted before, the committee has formed sub-committees in the areas of Finance, Operations and Communications. There will be more details of their findings in future articles. The August 8th meeting will be about Internal Affairs featuring the Solano County District Attorney, Don DuBain, and Curtis Cardwell from his department. On August 22 the discussion will surround ‘Citizens Review Committees’ and on September 5th, there will be a presentation by our new interim police chief who recently took over for Chief Nichelini.


According to the current Assistant City Manager Craig Whittom, the final committee written reports will be due on September 19th. “At that time we will know whether or not we shall need to extend the time of our study,” said Committee Chair Schivley. If anyone has any concerns, complaints, suggestions or comments at all, please come to the community forum portion of the next meeting on August 8 at 6:30 p.m. at the City Hall Council chambers. If you cannot make the meeting, send written comments to Ad Hoc Public Safety Committee 555 Santa Clara St., Vallejo, Ca. 94590. Or check them out on the Vallejo city’s web page. And remember, all meetings are aired on television on cable channel 28 and repeated again during the week. Check your local listings for repeat performances.

Comments
Add New Search RSS
Lack of Gray matter   |August.11.2012
Memories
If the family had a decent lawyer they would have access to reports etc.
Memories   |August.07.2012
Thanks for the heads up! Yes, the family and friends of Guy Jarreau would love for the Vallejo Police Department to expound upon why they STILL haven't given the mother of Guy Jarreau the police report, documenting the officer-involved shooting of her son on Saturday, December 11, 2010! We will continue this fight for justice for Guy Jarreau!!! We are NOT going away...
Anonymous   |August.07.2012
The neighborhood has a watch and everyone involved has done a good job. Code enforcement took some action, the VPD took action; a good effort and a long struggle. The final stakes through the heart of the vampires need to be done by those of us right there at ground zero. There is no other way to take back a neighborhood except for good people to be outside at 3am, 4am, 11pm, 1am. Take the fight to the enemy, be armed with guns or clubs if you prefer. Once you break the back of a squatter community or a den of pimps and their prostitutes, they go elsewhere. Be brave neighbors and fight.
Anonymous   |August.07.2012
@Annonymous
You sound like you need to get in toucn with Bob Sapayan to establish a neighborhood watch
Clarke Johnston   |August.07.2012
@Anonymous: I'm certainly taking care of my home front, rest assured. But, I have to follow all laws, which, unfortunately, prevent carrying.
Anonymous   |August.07.2012
Puck all that Clark, we are granted the right to bear arms by the Constitution. I don't need no stinkin badges, I carry a gun in my hand, round chambered and safety off when I venture into my backyard that is plagued by drug addict thieves. Let the chips fall where they may.
Clarke Johnston   |August.06.2012
@ Hollow Point: If your assessment of the situation is true, and I think that the argument does have some validity and weight, then our "society" is in much more trouble than rank and file citizens realize. What's all the more frustrated is that our chief toes the PC line about concealed carry, despite a sharply reduced staffing level, and clear evidence from his own department, that plenty of gangsters in this town are not only packing, but fearless in using their guns. Just looking at the number of officer involved shooting in Vallejo backs this up. We're living on rough streets,
and it's not improving. I know business people in this town who have been victims of armed robberies, and more than once. Two of my friends have been shot. They both survived, and promptly closed / sold their businesses and packed out. Now before I get misquoted as saying that everyone in town should be packing: I do firmly believe that a thorough vetting process that includes a review of the laws, a qualifying range shoot, background check, and a listing of the model/serial/caliber of the weapon used should be documented. That being said, California's "May Issue" status allows chiefs
to disregard the rights of responsible citizens who are willing meet criteria, step up to the plate, and be identified. None of which, of course, the criminals in this town, or Oakland, Richmond, San Francisco, Stockton, Compton, Watts or anywhere else will do. That's really the problem. Current gun laws are followed only by law-abiding citizens. The criminals, like those who shot up the House Party in the Crest, with complete and total disregard for the safety of the children present, could care less about the laws; or other peoples safety. That's why they're criminals. They don't think that
the law applies to them. It's the same mistake that I make when I've got my last ticket years ago, for speeding. I didn't think that the law applied to me, and was brought down a notch and corrected. Paid a crazy hefty fine, too. You're also quite correct regarding raids: When conducting raids, officers need a tactical advantage, because they never know what or who they're up against. Strength in numbers, well-trained and armed numbers at that. I couldn't help but notice, a couple of months ago, when the drug raids against the "Thizz Nation" rappers occurred, the usual 7 to 10
commenters per article on the Horrid's website blossomed into 25 or 30 comments, with nearly 80% of the comments supporting those arrested, and not the combined agencies enforcing the narcotics laws. Like the House Party shooting, just stunning on it's own.
hollow point   |August.06.2012
@ Clarke how long do you think Davis will be breathing if he takes on these gangsta
groups , about 5 seconds then his family will be next just to set an example .
these groups are worse than animals , at least animals show some some love and compassion . These gangs are more than VPD
and any local offical can handle this is why the raids are allways done by task force groups . The gangs have our local PD out gunned and our Community held hostage .
Sour Grapes   |August.05.2012
Sounds like Anon just doesn't like this committee, so whatever they do or say will never be enough. Oh well, don't watch the meetings then and ignore their recommendations. Maybe one will be to create a public safety committee. Or maybe not. We'll see.
Clarke Johnston   |August.05.2012
Mayor Davis can do nothing about the proliferation of guns on our streets. But, he does have a bully pulpit, a soap box from which to speak to the community. He is given, via his office, a unique ability to display leadership. At crisis times such as this violent shooting, a strong voice condemning the culture of violence is warranted. His voice not be heard by the parties responsible, no matter. This too, is part of his duties. Running the city council meetings with decorum and rules of order is all well and good, but that's only part of what should come with the office. Historically, Mayor
Davis has been MIA (Missing In Action) at such times, notable for his absence. After the assault on the city worker a couple of years ago, he only belatedly spoke with the press, only after being cornered in some hallway or office. A far cry form a press conference where the press is invited to attend and report. Many citizens lay the entire blame for incidents such as this at the feet of legal firearms owners, blaming us for the actions of others. The needed conversation about our culture, it's proclivity towards gun violence, bad musical influences, bad role models in popular film, these
appear to be third rails. It's as if they're off the table, not even eligible for discussion. Having myself been a victim of the Romper Room Gang, I'm in no mood to cut slack for elements within our community that present false role models as "good". I've had friends shot, their business robbed, and frankly don't care if people get their "feelings" hurt by taking on these social issues. Vallejo has nurtured, for some time, a strong thug presence, tacitly approved via silence by the older crowd, adored foolishly by the younger set. Mayor Davis frets about gays, prays for them,
but refuses to address our "Gangsta" ethic. Silence, looking the other way, effectively equates to tacit approval. It's like enabling a drug addict or alcoholic by not confronting them. Unchallenged, they will press ahead.
wharf rat   |August.05.2012
The house was full of Children these guys are nuts I hope they get enhanced sentencing what can Davis do about these wackos ?
Anonymous   |August.05.2012
Why isn't Mayor Davis holding a press conference today addressing the continuing issue of violence in The Crest? Oh that right, he's all dressed up for Sunday church and probably praying the violence away with Pastor Jefferson. This is an outrage.

Three shot in North Vallejo shoot-out
Gunmen open fire at house party, possibly gang-related, police say
http://www.timesheraldonline.com/news/ci_21238374/three-shot-north-vallejo-shoot-out
Anonymous   |August.05.2012
@Camera at Gateway - The camera at the corner of Gateway and Griffin is easily seen on the pole. It's white color. Nobody can miss it.
Camera at Gateway   |August.05.2012
I dont know if this camera has been installed yet?? If yes, easy to see what cars drive out, unless they run into a tree first...
Anonymous   |August.05.2012
@Clarke Johnston
re: "Ladies & Gentlemen, it's "Saturday Night" in Vallejo, at 5:52pm."

Wasn't the new police camera at the corner of Gateway and Griffin supposed to frighten away potential criminal activity in The Crest? Obviously that didn't work.
Anonymous   |August.04.2012
Wharf Rat, then maybe the Council should go back and change the resolution and not bother with the mission it originally established for this committee. They could just turn it into a Public Safety Commission if that's what everyone wants. Four months is long enough to focus on what our public safety departments do. Let's start looking beyond the city limits of Vallejo for more best practices we can afford. I'm sure there are some.
wharf rat   |August.04.2012
This committee is ground breaking and i am sure the members are learning allot as they go . I imagine they must be nimble and flexible as they gain insite into the workings of this dept, that has largely been a mystery to most of Vallejo . The PD and FD consume most of our budget and our Council as well as Us the taxpayers have every right for fact finding , in fact we would be irresponsible to do otherwise so I applaud the members who give of their time and energy to this Committee .
Clarke Johnston   |August.04.2012
Ladies & Gentlemen, it's "Saturday Night" in Vallejo, at 5:52pm. Details of course, subject to change. On air: A house party gone bad in the crest, VPD currently searching for up to three suspects with guns, one maybe with a rifle. Two injured parties at Kaiser. The remnants of the house party being brought out and searched, then parked on the sidewalk. 5:53 - House empty, no guns or suspects. Two units dispatched to Kaiser. K-9 coming to 315 Amelia and thereabouts for search. Two American Canyon units assisting with street closures and traffic control on Taper and Janice. Large man in
all black the main shooter, two teenaged boys with the handguns. Never a dull moment in V-Town !woohoo:
Anonymous   |August.04.2012
Has anyone bothered to revisit the mandate of this committee? What the resolution that established the committee charged them to do? They're supposed to be looking at best practices in policing and other public safety issues, some sort of a police review/human relations commission and trends in public employees salaries and benefits. Instead, they are getting reports on existing conditions in the City of Vallejo--that's NOT what they were charged to do. They need to re-focus on the three major objectives they were charged with. If the city needs an ongoing Public Safety Commission to report
existing conditions and accomplishments, then that should be one of this committee's policy recommendations to the council. They are an adhoc committee with a specific mission. They need to complete their assignment, make policy recommendations to the council and then be dissolved. If the committee is having difficulty focusing its work plan and mission, perhaps they should ask the public for help in a more informal setting and via a facilitated meeting as one of the committee members suggested recently. After four months of meetings, the only thing the committee has actually looked at is the
best practices of volunteer programs. At this rate, it'll be 2015 before the council gets a comprehensive report on all three committee objectives!
Anonymous   |August.04.2012
I hope the committee can make some recommendations on how to better integrate neighborhood watch, volunteers, reserve officers, cameras, etc. with the PD. Because I agree that our police need to focus on the "bigger" crimes (violence, gangs, robberies, etc). We as neighbors need to assist. That's what "community" is all about.

From what I've seen so far, the committee has pretty much stayed away from political position taking and has been really looking at the issues. If they can do it, why can't we? Let's find solutions and stop tearing things apart just because you don't
like someone.

(I watch the meetings on the city's website. Not sure if they're on TV. Click on the "agendas" button on the left on the home page. There is a list of archived meetings you can watch.)
Video   |August.03.2012
Is there a video on line we can watch?
Concerned   |August.02.2012
Good job Marc. Your news network link is informative stuff. Keep up the good work on keeping us informed.
Anonymous   |August.02.2012
Here's the dilemma that I see. Most of the residential burglary and property crimes are outside of police control. That is to say, we the citizens are closest to the action and are in a position to combat these low level criminals. The police force is needed for the higher level crimes or more serious incidents e.g. assaults, muggings, murders. This oversight committee should bring some benefits in terms of public education and feedback to the department but I believe most of us law abiding citizens want to attack the neighborhood level crimes. Any continued efforts on behalf of the
neighborhood watch groups and work to build an integration piece between the groups is where the low hanging fruit is IMO.

So the dilemma occurs when people look to this oversight committee for solutions to neighborhood crime and quality of life improvements but walk away frustrated. Let's all set our political differences aside and focus on citizen action to fight the scum that is invading our neighborhoods.
Clarke Johnston   |August.02.2012
I've been to one, and watch the others from home. Jim's comments regarding resource and man-hours allotments on non-violent, victimless clinic arrests deserve to be addressed by the committee. What's clear from the numerous "complainers" that "Just Saying" belittles, is how many Vallejo Citizens have been victims of daytime (and nighttime) car and residential burglaries that have gone completely without investigation, much less leading to arrests and/or convictions. This tidal wave of property crime, arriving at the same time as increasing gang activity and other assorted urban
blights, threaten Vallejo's recovery more than anything else.
Jim Davis   |August.02.2012
Thank you, Marc, for a fine review of the meeting. I will make an effort to watch from home, during day time hours. It is really good stuff to discuss and the fire and police representatives add a lot. I would like to know why police killings are not thoroughly investigated, reviewed, and reported by an independent agency, not the DA. I would like to know why police resources are wasted on marijuana clinics. I'll write a letter to the committee. Thanks again. Love, Jim
Anonymous   |August.01.2012
I care. I watch from home. So you somehow speak for everyone? Obviously not.
Just Saying   |August.01.2012
The Question is: How much more time do you need realize that this is a waste of time and nobody cares? Next point in fact. All the people that were complaining about not having a safety committee really did not want a committee what they wanted was to complain. These people have moved on "moved on to what you ask" it will be the proposed waterfront development or the rail on Mare Island or something like that. Just saying
wharf rat   |August.01.2012
Looks like the Committee also serves as a defacto risk management group this is a positive step and will reduce COV exposure to large lawsuites .
Write comment
Name:
 
:angry::0:confused::cheer:B):evil::silly::dry::lol::kiss::D:pinch:
:(:shock::X:side::):P:unsure::woohoo::huh::whistle:;):s
 
Please input the anti-spam code that you can read in the image.

3.23 Copyright (C) 2007 Alain Georgette / Copyright (C) 2006 Frantisek Hliva. All rights reserved."