|
|
|
Ethicalego (Kenneth Brooks) discusses current events from a critical thinking perspective rarely expressed elsewhere The public should hold Shirley Sherrod’s accusers accountable. July 29, 2010
Shirley Sherrod made a speech against racial hatred at an event sponsored by a Georgia chapter of the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP). However, a conservative blogger posted an internet video of her speech edited to show her admitting racist hated. Political analysts accepted the video as authentic and criticized Sherrod harshly for racism. The Obama Administration reacted to this criticism by forcing Sherrod to resign her position as Georgia State Director Rural Development for the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA). Even NAACP President and CEO Benjamin Todd Jealous supported her forced resignation. Sherrod's attackers allowed opportunism to supplant professional ethics if they had any.
Sherrod placed her accusers on the defensive when she protested their unfair attacks and complete videos of her speech confirmed her innocence. President Obama apologized for his administration officials' rush to judgment and offered her job back. Political analysts retracted their accusations. Bill O'Reilly said on his Fox Network show, "I owe Ms. Sherrod an apology for not doing my homework, for not putting her remarks into the proper context." However, National NAACP President Jealous shifted the blame to other people. He said, "We have come to the conclusion we were snookered by Fox News and Tea Party Activist Andrew Breitbart into believing she had harmed white farmers because of racial bias."
Sherrod may forgive her accusers, but the public should hold them accountable for unconscionable acts of opportunism. At minimum, they should have contacted the NAACP chapter that hosted the event to confirm the completeness of the video Sherrod's accuser posted on the internet. Being humans subject to error, they may not have discover all the relevant facts nor made suitable conclusions from them. Nevertheless, they are high profile pundits who influence what many Americans think and believe. Therefore, duty and professional ethics required more from them than an opinion based only on information posted by a blogger on the internet. Their lack of professionalism should alarm people who rely on them for information and direction even if they care nothing about Sherrod.
President Obama should fire administration officials who advised such a high profile and drastic action against Sherrod based on unexamined information. They also had a duty to him and the public to check the completeness and accuracy of the charges against Sherrod before forcing her resignation. President Obama acknowledged this omission. Nevertheless, he needs to do more and fire them. The public understands that he is one person who bases his decisions on information and advice from many staff members. They will mistrust his decisions if they mistrust the competency of his advisers.
Remarks against Sherrod by National NAACP CEO and President Jealous are most troublesome. As CEO, he had a duty to investigate charges of racism against Sherrod who spoke as a guest speaker at a NAACP event before he confirmed those charges in a public statement. He did not do this. Worse, he issued a retraction claiming that he was "snookered" by Fox News and by a conservative blogger's deceptive reporting about racism at the NAACP event. In other words, he admits that he accepted without question the truthfulness of racism charges against the NAACP and guest speaker made by people he believed hostile to his organization.
Jealous was so eager to prove the NAACP's new image as an organization for all ethnic groups he threw Sherrod and the local chapter's reputation under the bus. He should resign his office or the NAACP should force his resignation to preserve what integrity it has left.
Powered by !JoomlaComment 3.23
3.23 Copyright (C) 2007 Alain Georgette / Copyright (C) 2006 Frantisek Hliva. All rights reserved." |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||






Ethicalego Speaks
Thanks for then links captain, I understand how taking out bonds covers agencies like Sonoma C...
Good links, Captain. The articles point out that the pension obligation bond -POB- is only a sym...
Vallejo can't but the county can. Sonoma County just approved 290 million in pension obligation ...
Vallejo can't get anywhere near the bond market because of BK and not paying their bond holders.
John K, Although you are correct about the success of a parcel tax, I don't think the creation o...