Vallejo Code Enforcement Goes Public

 

 

By Hatfield McCoy

6/15//12

 

On June 11th the Vallejo Code Enforcement Division held a community forum at the Joseph Room of the downtown main Vallejo library. Approximately fifty people were in attendance. The purpose of the meeting was a little bit of information, and a lot of public relations. The meeting was opened by the Assistant City Manager Craig Whittom who introduced the Code Enforcement staff manager and some staff members. The Vallejo Code Enforcement department staff, along with its manager, Ms. Nimat Shakoor-Grantham, report directly to the Assistant City Manager, Mr. Whittom. “

 

Ms. Grantham first gave an overview of the Vallejo Code Enforcement’ and its overall responsibilities. She then explained the breakdown of ordinances with attached fees and fines. The agenda included the current staff priorities which are as follows: a.) Weed abatement (both city properties and those in unincorporated areas b.) Abandoned buildings (such as those due to fire) c.)Accessible pools d.) Temporary homeless encampments e.) Other miscellaneous hazardous properties. Grantham also informed the public that Code Enforcement has designated a few Vallejo properties for an injunction of receivership wherein the owner will forfeit all rights. The properties include two located at 816 Branciforte St., as well as properties located on Ohio, Tennessee, Marin, Falcon, Georgia and Idora Streets. The staff further covered their need for volunteers, and explained some of the current volunteer programs. “We need to hear from y’all,” Grantham said. As City Hall scrambles for more money, it seems that Code Enforcement just does not have the time to do it all. So, they beg for volunteers.  Some propose that if Code Enforcement staff would tag, fine, and collect the fees they have outlined, the department could become more than self sustaining; it could even make money. It was recently elected Councilmember Robert McConnell who campaigned on this issue. On the campaign stump he continuously repeated: “Some cities actually make big money on their Code Enforcement departments.” But, arguably, the Vallejo city Code Enforcement department just doesn’t do enough to achieve that goal.  That fact was well illuminated by an extensive 2009 Grand Jury report which outlined all of the things they should be doing, and have not been doing subsequent to the report release. (Click on Solano County Grand Jury/Vallejo Code Enforcement report). In fact, Ms. Grantham somewhat admitted this fact when she stated:  “There is a property on Capitol Street which the City Manager had to bring to my attention, as I did not even know about it,” Grantham said. “Of all of the listed problematic properties, that is probably our ‘crown jewel’ case,” she continued.

 

The meeting’s audience was a very sophisticated, informed segment of Vallejo’s population.  There were at times during the meeting when it seemed that the audience had more suggestions, and more answers than Ms. Grantham.  In fact, at one point Ms. Grantham read a well articulated email sent to her earlier that day by one attendee, Mr. Mustafa Abdul-Ghanee (Chair of the Human Relations Commission). After she read the email to the audience, she remarked: “Ain’t that great?” she asked, “I don’t know what it says, but it sure sounds good, but most of it went way over my head,” she quipped. One of the attendees had a question about the term ‘Receivership’ which was partially answered by another guest. And another participant had a question about the concept of a ‘Property Registration program’ in conjunction with the banks. The same gentleman explained that as well. Grantham explained, however, that the concept of ‘property registration’ had been brought before the city three times before, but the attorneys have “torn it apart, because of SB1137 and a lawsuit in Chicago brought on by Fannie Mae & Freddie Mac.  Someone else asked her who is responsible for broken sidewalks to which she replied: “This is an ongoing problem, Code Enforcement demands that it is the Public Works Dept., and they demand that it is the reporting responsibility of Public Works,” she stated in frustration.

   

On the upbeat side, Ms. Grantham noted that they now have a new phone system which should “make communication and other things much easier for the general public,” she said.  “I am also so happy that we now have about 300 neighborhood watch programs I also enjoy working with GVRD, Rebuild Vallejo and other such organizations.  Of course we are always happy to work with Fighting Back Partnership,” she continued.  She praised the new ‘Temporary Shelter Administrative’ rule which will greatly enhance the quality of life and potential for the homeless. Grantham also praised Vallejo citizen Doug Darling for his hard work with the homeless. She offered kudos to the over 300 established neighborhood watch programs, and gave a special nod to the staff of the Lamplighters Network Newsletter (a newsletter which goes out to the neighborhoods with updates and happenings). Grantham further praised the city manager for the good foresight in the future hiring of attorneys who will dedicate legal advice to the Code Enforcement division which could save the city thousands of dollars in potential lawsuits or problems.  She also promoted the volunteer program which helps to paint out graffiti quoting Councilwoman Stephanie Gomes who once said: “Graffiti is vandalism unless you get permission to do it.”  Nimat  Shakoor-Grantham ended the meeting by again asking for volunteers, and touched upon the volunteer training piece of her department. “I would like to see a new staff member in my department who would be paid maybe $17.00 an hour who could be our ‘Volunteer Coordinator’ in helping to assign citizen volunteers,” she said. Arguably, there should be enough money generated by Code Enforcement, with all of the abandoned homes and commercial buildings in Vallejo, to generate enough income for three new staff members, certainly at $17.00 and not at the upwards of $200,000 (including benefits) that Ms. Grantham is being paid.  For some reason, up until now, the Vallejo Code Enforcement has not received the attention and accountability oversight that other departments may have been given. The Grand Jury report all but went unnoticed. Perhaps, in future, the new Vallejo City Manager will find more than just comments about derelict houses on Capitol Street to give to Ms. Grantham. 

Comments
Add New Search RSS
keo;lhdifioop   |May.01.2013
kevin youkilis Jersey
brett gardner Jersey
michael pineda Jersey
chris stewart Jersey
joba chamberlain Jersey
david robertson Jersey
Tax Payer Too   |June.22.2012
Nimat needs to get 'otta Dodge' sooner rather than later!! Come on Mr. City Mgr. Dan Keen. Please do your job and start cleaning house at City Hall. I kinda like the pitchfork idea! Start with CF's Nimat - the Chief of Police - and the Acting Planning Director Hightower. They are all problematic. That would be a good place to begin to make an inroad of difference. But nobody asked me.
Anonymous   |June.20.2012
"how improve Downtown Vallejo"

The very definition of insanity

How about this idea: NO MORE PUBLIC MONEY for this multi decade boondoggle. Use your own money for your pipe dreams!
Fresh air   |June.19.2012
June 20 Wed from 6-8pm at Empress meeting to how improve Downtown Vallejo. Pls come.
Mousy   |June.19.2012
And who do you think notified those government groups? It was the Vallejo Architectural Heritage Foundation, same people who built City Park. The State may have had the big guns but it was the VAHF that brough them to the table.

Civic groups can do big things for a town when they act as watch dogs and know what they are doing.
Anonymous   |June.19.2012
The Mare Island legal challenge against the Master Plan and Final EIR was mounted by the National Trust for Historic Preservation with the goading of the National Park Service, the Department of the Interior and the California Office of Historic Preservation. The Vallejo Architectural Heritage Foundation was just the local partner. Nothing like a whole bunch of attorneys from a heavy hitting national organization to strike fear into the COV and Lennar. Bunch of local activists, fuggetaboutit. That's why Tony Intintoli blew off the threat when it was staring him in the face at the final vote.
wharf art   |June.19.2012
@ Mousy you are %100 right on !! " spare the rod spoil the Child " COV is terrified
of lawsuits , we have in house Council not litagators big difference if we hired a real red meat Lawyer once a year or so to
keep em honest it would pay back big .
another thing to consider is using a lobbyist on occasion (pls don't beat me up too bad folks )years ago I chipped in to have a repressive regulation removed it was enforced by the PUC who was milking out small Maritime opperations
My $500 was a great investment the $12,000 total spent whipped out the problem this was a real lesson
learned
re: the reality of how Govt works we thought the Lobbyist would be needing more money instead we all got a letter
stating problem solved regulation all gone this blew our Minds !! and was a hell of alot easier than a protracted
political fight .
New in town   |June.19.2012
I came here not yet a year now. Vallejo could be such a nice place to live. However not enough is being done like the code enforcement. You see it all over town. We have decided not to buy here but go somewhere else and to me that is sad this area could be so much better.
Mousy   |June.19.2012
Here's an excellent example of horrible Vallejo's code enforcement. This home has been a burnt out wreak for YEARS and PEOPLE LIVE THERE.

https://maps.google.com/maps?q=tennessee+st+and+santa+clara+st,+vallejo&hl=en&ll=38.110077,-122.259981&spn=0.008526,0.016673&sll=37.230328,-95.712891&sspn=35.075003,68.291016&t=h&hnear=Tennessee+St+%26+Santa+Clara+St,+Vallejo,+Solano,+California+94590&z=16&layer=c&cbll=38.110077,-122.259981&panoid=gpHcu3y9sFoxIckUoKuaDw&cbp=12,111.89,,0,0.93

It's on the corner of Tennessee and Santa Clara. I think it burned in 2008-ish? You regularly see cars parked in
driveway. Pretty sure people still live in the unit downstairs. The place should be fixed or torn down.

Yet the city has done NOTHING. They are negligent in enforcing the codes.
Mousy   |June.19.2012
Here
Monica   |June.18.2012
Thanks for the synopsis, VIB, and all the comments, VIB-ers. I'm learning a great deal about the goings on of our beautiful city. We need to create an instructional unit for our local high school seniors to show them that being involved in city politics can be as good as TV: Vallejo Civic CSI...
moto velo espidi   |June.18.2012
greetings all,

What a fascinating story on the 11 jun 12 meeting. This woman is really working for me? I am Appalled at her behavior and remarks if they are true. Much needs to be done for this department to operate professionally and respectfully. I am concerned about this woman and her qualifications to manage this department. Is this salary compensation correct?

I look at my own property and see that there are some repairs to the sidewalk that will cost an amount of funds that is at least a two year save and pay project. Hopefully, no one will trip and fall on the walk in front of my
home. I am liable for their inability to make the necessary maneuvers to avoid the hazard in front of them? I do see the need to keep all of our side walks clear and free of hazard for we could one day be blind and unable to walk. That could be a revelation to many of us that it is important to trim the bushes and patch the easement in front of our homes. It is also a reflection of us about the neighborhood and the people we live with - pride in our shelter. thank you.

Best regards..........
Anonymous   |June.18.2012
Easy way for Vallejo to cleanup and get rid of the dumpy look - Vallejo should have nuisance and cleanliness laws like Singapore.. Fines run up to $1000 for littering, It is illegal to pee in elevators, Selling chewing gum is forbidden, No pornography of any kind is allowed, Gay sex is illegal and comes with a two-year jail term, You can get fined for not flushing public toilets, It is illegal to walk around your house naked, Do not spit anywhere, You can be arrested for taking drugs before entering the country.
http://www.businessinsider.com/absurd-laws-of-singapore-2012-6
Billy the Greek   |June.18.2012
The Writ of Mandate idea sure beats that ill conceived recall effort initiated by certain parties who will remain un-named. It would cost money but it would cost the City more to defend itself. I don't know how you would go about rounding up all the support (financial and legal) needed to get this ball rolling. The angry masses are disorganized, dispirited and prone to squabbling. Great suggestion, however. If you could find a rich "sugar daddy" who wanted to sponsor such an initiative I for one would donate. Wikipedia extract follows:
In some state court systems, mandamus
has evolved into a general procedure for discretionary appeals from non-final trial court decisions. In some U.S. states, such as California, the writ is now called mandate instead of mandamus, and may be issued by any level of the state court system to any lower court or to any government official. It is still common for Californians to bring "taxpayer actions" against public officials for wasting public funds through mismanagement of a government agency, where the relief sought is a writ of mandate compelling the official to stop wasting money and fulfill his duty to protect the
public fisc. The writ of mandate is also used in California for interlocutory appeals. In this context, the party seeking the writ is treated on appeal like a plaintiff, the trial court becomes the defendant, and the opponent is designated as the "real party in interest."
Anonymous   |June.18.2012
As Salty would say, 'I like the cut of your jib Mousy'.
Anonymous   |June.18.2012
It's called a Writ of Mandamus. It is a demand that a jursidiction do what it is supposed to do and it is a court order. So maybe we can all go in on an attorney, get a writ of Mandamus written up and everybody file it.
Mousy   |June.18.2012
Actually what the City of Vallejo needs is to get sued by its residents more often, like the Vallejo Architectural Heritage Foundation (which is all Vallejo private citizens) did to stop COV from violating CEQA on Mare Island. All it took to get the city to start following the law was the threat of a lawsuit. Lawsuit then dropped, Mare Island's assets saved (like protecting St Peter's Chapel and its Tiffany windows from demolition near by). Right now we only get outside agencies threatening lawsuits to make things happen. Like for more affordable housing! This is NOT working in our favor. We
need Vallejoans pushing the city to mind the law.

Does any one know if we can sue to the city for not enforcing its ordinances? If you document a violation and submit it several times, it shouldn't be too hard to bring some sort of legal action against the city. Enough to pay attention and follow the law at least, which is the entire point. I'm no lawyer though.

If you can't use the democratic process to make the city pay attention, use a legal one. A lawyer with too much time on his or her hands taking action against the COV's negligence would be a darn good thing IMHO. That's one of the
reasons Marin pays so much more attention to its citizens - they'll sue because they think a proposed light fixture is ugly (ugh, I'd leave if Vallejo ever got to that point). So it pays to pay attention and follow process or you'll get your butt sued for mundane things. But here in Vallejo we don't have a population of bored lawyers to force a better standard of living. So we need to step up!
Billy the Greek   |June.18.2012
Well said, Tramky ... your comments were similar to my missing text. Very succinct and "right on the money" ... City Hall has us over a barrel and they know it ... we have such a low level of voter registration and even lower voter turn-out they don't have much incentive to react to the rabble (some of us) who might challenge them and rock their cozy little boat. Until this changes this town will remain a stagnant cess pool (hey! isn't that an oxymoron?). Personally, although no one cares, nor should they ... I wouldn't expect them to ... I can't wait to get out of here ... I've
invested in Butte County for my retirement. And in anticipation of any snide side comments like "Well, Greek, don't let the door hit you in the ass on the way out" ... I've already got the door off the hinges ... (to tell you the truth, some local house thieves helped me with that little project) ... lolol ... what a city.
tramky   |June.18.2012
The heart of the problem at City Hall is that there are no performance evaluations, and no methodology for doing them. And doing performance evaluations on civil service jobs is a waste of time anyway--they can't be fired unless, maybe, they are taken out of the building in handcuffs. And even then they will claim to have a 'right' to the job and all its benefits--it was promised to them.

Everyone in government sits on the same side of the table--taxpayers sit on the other side with no real representation, even the few elected officials. But City employees are ALL grinding the same axe,
which leads to their millionaire status at taxpayer expense.
Anom   |June.18.2012
We tried to work with code enforcement to clean up neighbors bordering on hording. Yards looked like junk yards. Rats were starting to show up. At the end those in question yelled and shouted loud enough to intimidate the city. They cleaned up what could be seen. Immediately went back to their normal routine, house still is left partially painted after 4 years. Instead of waiting for someone to be reported why don't they just look and address the problems?
Billy the Greek   |June.18.2012
... as usual ... the balance of my post did not transfer with the original ... but the general reader should be able to get my drift.
Billy the Greek   |June.18.2012
Grantham is a joke ... a buffoon and incompetent who can't even speak properly ... very unprofessional. This is not what I want to hear from someone in her position:
Anonymous   |June.17.2012
All of this evidence of official harrassment by city staff is why the flag "anonymous" or nomes de plume are so important. And why blogging on the TH site might be a bit dangerous. COV staff can guess all they want about who someone is, but they can't really be sure.
wharf rat   |June.17.2012
It is true I have seen it with my own eyes
A Senior had the kitchen sink thrown at them for minor peeling paint on exterior trim only, this following a family loss was devastating . someone was using CE for a hit job ! the resulting high BP and stroke almost killed them . many of the codes are vague and subject to interpretation this leaves alot of room for bullying and abuse .
Anonymous   |June.17.2012
Reminds me of the incident where the head of Planning, Ann Meridith, was wandering around the California Preservation Foundation annual conference asking for recommendations for consultants who could "circumvent CEQA" reguarding those pesky National Historic Landmarks on Mare Island. Created quite a stir among those gathered back then (1996?) She left to work for Lafayette. So who told her to break the law????? And then a friend at the Army Corps of Engineers told me that Vallejo had a habit of breaking environmental laws which is why they filled Mariner's Cove without a permit and
got fined a whole bunch of money. That was during the Mayor Curtola, Vice Mayor Intintoli period.
Anonymous   |June.17.2012
yes.
Firebug   |June.17.2012
avatar I think you fellows are on to something bigger here. Selective enforcement and cronyism certainly fits the methodology here. What happened to all the pining about firing the head of CE? Are some afraid what she might say?
Anonymous   |June.17.2012
"Someone else asked her who is responsible for broken sidewalks to which she replied:
Boris   |June.17.2012
Natasha's a psycho.
wharf rat   |June.16.2012
@ Silas just ask Natasha but put on your fire proof jacket first , that Gal is a one Women fireworks show . We should nominate Her for Vallejo Inspector General
and Chief bean counter WOW !! some folks would be walking funny ..
silasbarnabe   |June.16.2012
avatar So begging the bigger question is will Ms. Grantham give up why Uncle Bucks down town slum properties have been ignored while other property owners have been sent letters of demand? Please Code Enforcement despite the fact I feel your level of corruption is minor compared to the Police and Fire Department can you tell us why uncle Bucks properties are exempt?
wharf rat   |June.16.2012
A more relevant structure and mission is needed the dept needs to be re-invented
some Cities have developed Neibourhood
preservation and protection ordinances
using a proactive prevention based up front initial response to mitigate problems before they grow ( see the broken window theory ) if things escalate then the prevention heavies go to work with citations warnings,fines etc , most often the first tier works without allot of staff time if not go to tier two or three . we have to adopt the if it's broke fix it agenda not the let it malinger for 20 years while paying for it .
Anonymous   |June.16.2012
2010 CBC Section 116 Unsafe Structures...

116.3 Notice. If an unsafe condition is found, the building official shall serve on the owner, agent or person in control of the structurea written notice that describes the condition deemed unsafe and specifies the required repairs or improvements to be made to abate the unsafe condition, or that requires the unsafe structure to be demolished within a stipulated time. Such notice shall require that the person thus notified to declare immediately to the building official acceptance or rejection of the terms of the order. ( rejection by the owner does
not nullify the order, it just moves the CBO into hyperdrive)

Nothing in the CBC about 5 notices. Excuses, excuses, excuses.
Anonymous   |June.16.2012
Prove it before you spread rumors. Just how has Gomes protected Nemat? Councilmembers have nothing to do with hiring/firing of employees. So give us some specific details or instances where you've seen this happen.

Gomes and Pearsall have worked with her on the anti graffiti program (I'm one of the proud volunteers), but how is that "protection"? It's called getting $hit done. I'm guessing whoever is in the CE manager position they'd work with that person too.

Why don't you call Mr. Keen and ask him if Gomes is protecting Nemat or any employee in the city. Then come back and let us
know what his answer is.
Anonymous   |June.16.2012
Nimat, the Code Enforcement Officer, didn't create the situation but she hasn't been as proactive about what isn't working as she should be. Code enforcement requires that five notices be issued to a violator before a citation can actually be issued. This is ridiculous and it explains why CE isn't cost effective. I agree with Robert McConnell that most cities make money off of citations that are issued by their code endorcement departments. In fact, Mr. McConnell appears to be the only city council member who gets the connection between citations and a better looking urban environment. Note to
City Council, staff up CE and review citation policies. Five notices is at least two to many.
know vallejo   |June.16.2012
@anonymous who talks about craig whittom, you hit the nail on the head. people can find fault with nimat all they want. she isn't the problem. craig whittom is and has been, for a long time now. a complete waste of my taxpayer dollar and eventually a part of our huge unfunded liability. he's an even greater liability as ACM. he needs to go.
wharf rat   |June.16.2012
The Casa de Vallejo case is a real mystery
many laws were violated as were industry best practices and CCR's ,were local ordinances violated as well ? was the FD even aware of the alarm system status. the
charges started out as felony Manslaughter
and criminal negligence if I recall . must have been a big settelement or some other legal loop hole, at the least the responsible parties should have been banned from the industry for life . did the alarm system transmit to an alarm monitoring service at all ? I know the smoke detectors were disabled as was the audible alarm "absolutely
unbelievable"
did they get off scott free ? if so was anyone held accountable ..
silasbarnabe   |June.16.2012
avatar @Witness,
You make the most sense to me the mantra of the puppetmaster is "selective enforcement" Which would explain the bizarre and unknown reasons why pot facilties are raided and meth labs ignored, why the Case De Vallejo did not have a safety inspection, and others may have, of why some properties are cited and others not.

We need to find those that are pulling the strings, and I think if we fired the leadership of the respective departments with the possibility of losing their pensions they might sing like a canary.
Witness   |June.16.2012
SCE "selective code enforcement"has been the mantra for years in town , often used to do a hit job on a neibour one dosn't
like or to leverage a low price on property . it has been abused and mismanaged for decades . I have seen it used as an attack job on Seniors with minor peeling paint when politically connected rental property with garbage
and code issues abound . I wonder what it costs to not get a citation ? this is a prime example of disfunctional GOVT
and should not be funded nor tolerated
while it might be hard to can Employees
it is easier to de-fund the dept and start
all over using a proven model field tested in other Cities .
Really?   |June.16.2012
Namat has spoken at public meetings over the years. She has said the same things; same complaints, without any solutions. The audience always seems to know more than she does. We need proactive, decisive, money making managers (look at what our economic development manager, Ms. Luna-Reynosa recently achieved with the Today in America piece... great state wide media, selling positivism, business and growth of Vallejo)

If what people write is true that Councilmember Gomes and ex Fighting Back executive director Tony Pearsall have been protecting the CE manager, then we as residents need to
speak out against that protection, even if you support Ms. Gomes. It's time to pull back the curtains and look at who is doing the job and who is not.

In my opinion, we need a new CE manager and maybe a new supervisor of that manager other than Mr. Whittom.
silasbarnabe   |June.16.2012
avatar No smoking gun yet on the puppetmaster, Our Police Chiefy does not answer to Whittom, nor the Fire Chief both of which were responsible for the epic fail of burning down a house that yielded no suspects and the Casa De Vallejo disaster. Like I said the loss of life from one of the disasters might consitute termination with cause and even loss of the leaders pensions. I can assure everyone if an example is made including the loss of pension, you wouldn't see the staring down and unprofessional behavior of some of the Officers and other employees that attended the council meetings last December.
Anonymous   |June.16.2012
2010 CBC Section 116: Unsafe structures and equipment.

116.1 Conditions. Structures or existing equipment that are or hereafter become unsafe, insanitary or deficient because of inadequate means of egress facilities, inadequate light and ventilation or which constitute a fire hazard, or are otherwise dangerous to human life or public welfare, or that involve illegal or improper occupancy or inadequate maintenance shall be deemed an unsafe condition. Unsafe structures shall be taken down and removed or made safe, as the building official deems necessary and as provided for in this section. A
vacant structure that is not secured against entry shall be deemed unsafe.

Forget Nimat, it is not her job. But Whittom lives for "blight" because he can successfully beg for more entitlement grants from the Feds. If you want to know why this is happening, follow the money.
Enough   |June.16.2012
This is ridiculous. The CE manager cannot answer why it cannot sustain itself with fees? I have a property on my block that has big problems. I reported the property last year, minor fixes occurred. Today? They are all back, with more, and more garbage, and problems. I reported again. This is rental property. They need to cite the owner, give them 30 days to clean it up, and if not, start fining the owner AND COLLECT IT, or file liens against the property. Enough with the "we don't have enough staff." Councilmember McConnell is absolutely correct, in most cities, the CE
department MAKES money, not just sustains itself. Here, its a drain. And it appears the CE manager does not have any plans, ideas, or even thoughts on how to address that problem and get CE to do more of what is suppose to do and become self sustaining. (Our city can ticket carpoolers, but our city can't fine owners creating and maintaining nuisances and health problems?)

Re: the homeless: GET THE COUNTY INVOLVED. Homelessness, shelters, providing for the down and out and services for them, is in part a COUNTY problem. This will help with solutions. I commend the state, they discovered
the camp set up on Sacramento near 37, was state land, and they gave 72 hours notice, and came in, removed everything, (hopefully made sure all property preserved and given to the owners and/or stored so they could pick up later), but then BULLDOZED the property to get rid of the overgrowth where the camps were hidden, as were the fire pits. (Yeah, fires and overgrowth and weeds.... wonderful combination). Anyway, they made a decision and came. CE?? Years, and years and years, and still the same stuff is coming out of Namat's mouth at these public meetings.

Look at the grand jury report
from years ago, identifying what the failures of CE were. THEY STILL EXIST>

We need a new CE manager. Craig Whittom needs to do his job and superviser her and make sure she does her job, or find someone who will.
Anonymous   |June.16.2012
Every problem we have in Vallejo from Economic Development to subsidized housing to Code Enforcement to PSU contracts has Craig Whittom's fingerprints all over them. He has been the Assistant City Manager every time the PSUs get rid of a City Manager the PSUs don't like because they stop doing their bidding. Craig has been at the table during every labor negotiation so he knew the notification clause was in the contract. Some poor patsy gets the blame. Same with Nimat. What CE focusses on is peeling paint and weeds. That's their job. They don't deal with structural defects or unsafe
buildings...that's the Chief Building Official's job in accordance with the California State Building Code 2010 adopted by the COV. The lack of internal coordination between fire, building, VHA, planning and CE is Whittom's epic fail. If CE is the point of pubic contact for a complaint, then they need to establish a proper team and deal with it. Having blatant vacant unsafe, nuisance buildings in a neighborhood for 14 years or more is unacceptable. The "unsafe" building in my neighborhood is cited repeatedly for peeling paint when the foundation is failing. Who cares about paint, get
bulldozers!!!!!
Anonymous   |June.16.2012
Wow. It certianly doesn't appear Vallejo is getting any bang for the buck from the CE manager. For starters, it sounds like the position is over her head. Who does she report directly too? Craig Whittom? What has he done to help get the CE department humming? Does he think she can handle this very important function?
silasbarnabe   |June.16.2012
avatar This wreaks of "ignore the man behind the curtain" I am continually amazed at how much more inept those that work for this City are. This is not just about code enforcement. Anyone remember the Casa De Vallejo Fire and the non-functioning emergency systems.

Who was in charge of inspecting that? Why were the owners that were arrested mysteriously released and all charges dropped? Could it be that it was found that the City may have had culpability for not inspecting the safety systems?

Just like the little mistake of the letter not getting to the VPOA to re-open negotiations, hell
lets go further at who were the dummies that allowed a clause like that to be on a contract. How is it there is never follow up from our leader around screw ups like when the Police burned down a house trying to apprehend four suspects that weren't even in the house.

This entire City needs a shakeup from department heads to certain employees. I often wonder who is the puppetmaster here? Who sets the priroities? I have seen some fine work from all departments here then such utter goofs that I can not help but feel these goofups are because of the puppetmasters mis-aligned or inconsistent
application of priorities and resources. I can assure you firing some of them for cause and if they are incompetent in a way we can even take their pensions, you will see an attitude change in the rest of them.
Retired_IBEW   |June.16.2012
CE in Vallejo is an epic fail and has been for at least 30 years. When a bureaucracy can't produce results after decades of throwing money at it, it's time to get rid of it. Layoff everyone working in CE. Assign weed abatement to the fire department and hire a civilian to assist with it. Assign the remaining functions to the Police Department and hire a civilian to manage it. Use one of those attorneys to re-write the muni code and update CE laws. Start with a $100 a day fine for violations and ask the City of Fairfield how to collect the money since Vallejo seems incapable of figuring that
out.
Fly on the Wall   |June.16.2012
I agree, Salty. But realize this is a city coming out of bankruptcy. It is slowly starting to rebuild itself and reorganize how it does business, all within the context of available resources. I watched the council meeting last week and saw where the budget is. I saw where the budget was 10 years ago. I think this city is doing more to restructure itself and do a better job than it did when it had 1/3 more revenue.

I saw this push-pull from the public and some councilmembers to use Measure B money to hire more cops only. Others want to balance it so they hire more cops, but also CE and that
neighborhood law program and Econ development. I believe the second approach is the most wise. Fix the broken windows and our economy will improve and we'll have more money for more cops.

Some people are a bit too impatient for everything to be fixed at once. Stop a moment and look at what has been accomplished during such a terrible time. This resident sees improvement, although small, and I'm going to keep the hope alive and support the city in helping them do more and do better. It's just so easy to sit here and point fingers at people and complain. Look at the positives and help fix the
negatives. Showing support for people trying hard works wonders for quickening change. Volunteering gives a whole new perspective.

As for CE, it definitely needs reorganization and refocus. I trust that the new CM will do that. Write emails or call councilmembers you feel comfortable approaching. They can put pressure on the city manager for change. But if he hears no complaints, change will be slow.
momster   |June.16.2012
I know Criminal Codes and some civil, Appeals and Writs; and was raised in Vallejo (learned to be tough) and know when to act polish (learned this in Marin). I've worked with many prominent lawyers and Judges. If I don't know something, I don't have a problem learning something new. Other Cities manage to enforce simple ordinances whereas Vallejo has never in my lifetime enforced ordinances.I say disolve CE with the Police Department and get rid of another high-paying department head.

or hire me and I'll do the job for 65K because wouldn't that be the amount Vallejo could afford?

and if
you don't want me here then put down the ouji board.
Jim Davis   |June.16.2012
Thank you, Marc Garman. Nice report. Katy taught you well. It is all quite confusing, obviously involving property law of considerable complexity, in defense of Shakur-Grantham. Just having the discussion in public (especially in the IVB forum) will make a big difference. People are always wondering what Code Enforcement does because there is so much to be done. This is a first step. Thanks, Marc. Love, Jim
Salty Dog   |June.16.2012
Sorry anon, I didn't say enforce all ordinances all the time. That would only occur in a utopian world.

But it isn't beyond the scope of even little ole Vallejo to apply substantive
enforcement action that is more than the current token effort. Full force and substantive resources applied to enforcement is required and well within the scope of the city's ability and, in fact, is its duty to the residents.

Political will and prioritizing enforcement is key.
Anonymous   |June.16.2012
Sorry Salty. No city can enforce all ordinances at all times. There isn't enough money or manpower, and I doubt there ever would be. Maybe in Utopia, or Canada, but not here where unions rule the public sector world.
Not in Lockstep   |June.15.2012
I can not understand how and why Nimat is still employed by COV. That woman is a walking chaos-monger and should have been canned long ago. Enough excuses and covering, sh*t can her ass and get someone in there who is organized, intelligent and determined.

Yes I can be called a VIB devotee but we don't all walk in lock step.
Myrnas house red tagged   |June.15.2012
816 Branciforte is the hovel Myrna Hayes made of her home, a blight on the surrounding neighborhood.
Salty Dog   |June.15.2012
There is something fundamentally wrong with a governance body that eschews its own rules and regulations established by successive governing bodies for the betterment of a community.

There is something particularly disrespectful to citizens when a governing body fails to operationalize the very foundation of its existence- that is, to establish a Civil Code and enforcement staff that can effectively monitor and correct infractions and contribute to the financial bottom line- paid by those who choose not to follow laws.

It is a no brainer, and yet, we see these people dancing around with
their pr and bureauspeak as portrayed above.

It is nothing short of evil and people are becoming disillusioned and hurt. Some permanently.

Every right minded and right thinking resident should be insisting that the Vallejo Municipal Code is fully enforced by whatever means and at whatever cost.

I would guess that the quality of life would improve immediately, followed closely by an enforcement department that actually contributed to general revenues.
Fly on the Wall   |June.15.2012
Hasn't anyone been paying attention these last four or so years? Councilmembers who have mentioned employee pay/benefits (and not just police) have been skewered as union/employee haters. 10% salary cut across the board was called for just before bankruptcy. Heresy! Burn them at the stake!

All employee pay is way too high, maybe except for some IBEW members. If we'd just cut salary levels 10% or 15% think of the employees we could hire in code enforcement, etc.

No offense, because I like him, but McConnell can say all he wants that CE should make more money. That ain't a new idea and its a
great soundbite. But making that happen with the revenue the city has now doesn't seem to allow for much "ya gotta spend money to mke money" investments. Like Shakoor-G or don't like her, there just aren't enough employees in that department to be most effective. So cut salaries across the board, hire more CE officers and building inspectors, and things will start changing. If Keen sees that a change is needed in CE management, something tells me he won't hesitate to change it.
Anonymous   |June.15.2012
Yeah, mommy, they're being mean to me. Punish them! Punish them!
Momster   |June.15.2012
anybody and everyone who insults Code Enforcement is Carolyn.

I have not posted anything until now.
Dear Editinator   |June.15.2012
Mr. Garman, I truly resent the hostile attitude of the person who just insulted me using the alias "Anonymous".

I don't know who they are referring to by claiming I am someone named "Carolyn".

What I do know is this "Anonymous" person has a reputation for being rude and aggressive with others who post here and I for one believe it's time, for the good of your website, that you admonish them with a warning to stop this kind of behavior. Their attitude certainly does not lend to intelligent discourse.

I believe I was fully within my rights to express my opinion as
stated in my last post.
Clarke Johnston   |June.15.2012
If our Code Enforcement department warranted a Grand Jury report, then there's clearly fundamental, ground floor problems. That the report was, in effect, a total waste of taxpayer time and dollars, and was ignored, speaks to bureaucratic hubris nearing contempt. Weeds are priority #1? Pools and homeless encampments rate this highly? Sounds like the whole #$#%! list needs to be reworked. Ms. Grantham's salary should be immediately cut to around $70K, with the balance going to hire three more employees to accomplish grunt tasks. With any decent cellphone having a camera, writing citations
backed by photo evidence should be almost as easy as parking tickets. How hard can this be? As "Tax Payer" noted above, performance goals must be established, and brought to bear, quickly. Reviews every 90 days to measure results. Councilman McConnell is correct, it's beyond comprehension that this department isn't a revenue source instead of a drain. Mr. McConnell continues to show a common sense steak sorely lacking elsewhere in City Hall. As for our current Code Enforcement head, and this may be unduly harsh, the word inept springs to mind.
Anonymous   |June.15.2012
Shut up, Carolyn. Go teach your kids to not be like you and your husband.
Nimat's Umbrella   |June.15.2012
" For some reason, up until now, the Vallejo Code Enforcement has not received the attention and accountability oversight that other departments may have been given. The Grand Jury report all but went unnoticed. Perhaps, in future, the new Vallejo City Manager will find more than just comments about derelict houses on Capitol Street to give to Ms. Grantham."

That's because her friends Gomes and Pearsall shielded her from scrutiny for years.

Grantham and Whittom need to get the ax.
Anonymous   |June.15.2012
It's not just lawyers, it's a Neighborhood Law program. Look it up. Cops don't solve all problems. It's a combo of efforts.
Anonymous   |June.15.2012
Notice, it's Code Enforcement. Someone's definition of "enforcement" (City Hall) apparently is hiring more Lawyers, per Shakoor-Grantham ("Grantham further praised the city manager for the good foresight in the future hiring of attorneys", not hiring more Police Officers for "enforcement". Wharf rat is right - if a shakeup is coming soon, Code Enforcement should be the first to get the axe.
Vallejo Citizen   |June.15.2012
Craig Whittom didn't even show up little alone speak.
wharf rat   |June.15.2012
Yes Salt and hammer handles too ! sounds like proactive is missing as opposed to reactive . Alot of these problems could be nipped in the bud with a more proactive approach such as time in the field with modern communications no one is glued to the desk and if you have to get your hands dirty sometimes just reflect on your 200,000 + salary , well anyway sounds like there will be a shakeup soon a much needed one the CM is gradually getting His Ship seaworthy and hopefully can muster an able crew .
Salty Dog   |June.15.2012
I entirely agree....what a bunch of fatuous poop, to over use the phrase.

I don't want "proactive" and I dont even want to hear, "I hear ya", and I certainly get positively catatonic when I hear a professional disparage the remarks of citizens. Who the hell pays your tab, babe.

Weed abatement? Oh that's a safe one. How abouit noise abatement? But then you would have to interface with people and by the look of it, that isn't your strong suit, Ms Proactive.

But I am sure everyone from the city side went home feeling self satisfied and deserving of their six figure
wages.

Incredibly stupid people are in charge here folks. Time for some pitchforks.
Tax Payer   |June.15.2012
Another overpriced non-functioning flop
better to just start all over again with a
proactive approach a get the job done attitude and a serious reduction in salary
coupled with a performance bonus element
this Dept could be proforma and self supporting .
Write comment
Name:
 
:angry::0:confused::cheer:B):evil::silly::dry::lol::kiss::D:pinch:
:(:shock::X:side::):P:unsure::woohoo::huh::whistle:;):s
 
Please input the anti-spam code that you can read in the image.

3.23 Copyright (C) 2007 Alain Georgette / Copyright (C) 2006 Frantisek Hliva. All rights reserved."