LOW HANGING FRUIT &

 

THE DOWNTOWN

 

VACANT BUILDING ORDINANCE DISCUSSED AT THE

‘FOCUS ON THE DOWNTOWN MEETING’ ON AUGUST 29th

 

By Hatfield McCoy

9/3/12

 

Approximately thirty-five people showed up for the little advertised third and final overview of the downtown improvement plan. Vallejo’s Economic Development Director, Ms. Ursula Luna-Reynosa, Acting Planning Director, Michelle Hightower, Code Enforcement Director Nimat Shakoor-Grantham, a city staffer from Engineering, representatives of both the Police Dept. along with Public Works, and the Director of the Housing Authority, Ms. Melinda Nestlerode worked together to inform the public of progress being made on the enhancement of downtown at their third and last community forum held on August 29 at the Empress Theatre. “We would like to show you our proposals to fix some immediate concerns of the community, the ‘low hanging fruit,’ if you will,” said Luna-Reynosa. With that she launched into an explanation of projects to be completed within the seven following categories: 1.) Economic Development, 2.) Safety & Cleanliness, 3.) Infrastructure (Repair & improvement of public streets, alleys, etc. 4.) Youth & Education 5.) Organizations/Communication/Partnerships 6.) Housing & Homelessness and 7.) Image & Perception.

 

Luna-Reynosa stated that based on her experiences in “other jurisdictions” it is very difficult to attract larger chain businesses to an historic downtown area. “Typically they want to be near a freeway, have x# of people passing by with potential of even more foot traffic, have a day-time population of x within a one mile radius, things of that nature,” she said. “So we must concentrate on attracting smaller businesses to the downtown.In doing so we decided to redefine fast-food restaurants to permit smaller cafes to go in without planning approval. As it is right now, we have a large number of fast food places in Vallejo, and under our current planning codes, cafes constitute fast foods; so we are going to change that to allow more small cafes. Furthermore, we are going to modify encroachment requirements for outdoor dining to establish more outdoor/sidewalk seating,” she said. In addition to that, city staffers are going to consider special reduced fees for projects that will enhance the image of downtown. They might also reduce fees and/or defer certain public works fees for projects in downtown including earthquake retrofitting for a designated time period. “Also, currently Code Enforcement is ‘reactive’ to complaints, (they do not respond unless someone calls in with a complaint). We are now going to make that department ‘proactive’ and we shall be pursuing more fees for properties not in compliance,” she said.


With respect to safety, Shakoor-Grantham stated that they will now take a collaborative approach and work with other groups such as the new Neighborhood Law Program which will target clean-up of blighted properties, engaging landlords to remove blighted conditions. They also wish to implement an ‘Adopt a Site/Downtown Street Program’ to maintain alleys and streets. Code Enforcement will designate downtown as a priority area, and will work with Recology & Public Works to distribute informational letters to non-compliant property owners, with warnings of potential fines if they do not cooperate. They will also send letters regarding design elements as outlined in CPTED (Crime Prevention through Environmental Designs.)This will help deter crime with such things as more & improved lighting, and public benches with arm rests to deter people from sleeping full length on benches.


With respect to infrastructure, there is a plan in place to place diagonal parking along Georgia St. from Sonoma to Sutter streets to incorporate the “Complete Streets Program of 2008.” Implement downtown directional signs, and public parking signs. The cutting of the ribbon to officially unveil the downtown garage is set for October 11th. (The garage has been closed due to excessive water in the electrical mechanism of the elevator.) Staffers will also send letters to property owners with respect to alleys and areas in front of their buildings. It was recently learned that a building owner is responsible for the alley near their building up to the half way point of the alley.


As to youth and education – the city wants to provide more opportunity for youth downtown. One of the things in the works is to display art done by the youngsters on the walls of City Hall. The second and third floors will be available for same. The city has some funding from each department to help with this program. They also plan to explore land use for higher education offices and/or classrooms. The city also wants to work with the Downtown Arts & Entertainment committee to develop more venues attractive to college students. It was also mentioned that they will work with GVRD and the Youth Commission to develop a partnership for youth oriented actitivities. Luna-Reynosa said that a new private school with an emphasis on Math & Science will soon be opening on Georgia St. It will try to make headway in helping at risk students who might not otherwise be given enough resources to graduate. (This will bring educators, administrators and parents downtown too.)


On to Communications & Partnerships: The city will soon implement tree lighting on Georgia St. (thanks to the undying efforts of Fred Menard- owner of Indian Alley Antiques on Georgia St.) They are also working on a new web design, and more ‘user friendly’ connectivity with the public. Some of that is witnessed by the new general permit center (the one stop shop at City Hall). (To his credit, former interim City Manager Batchelor implemented this change.) Furthermore, they are sending a monthly newsletter to anyone who submits an email address to facilitate the distribution. The new City Manager, (as of March) Mr. Dan Keen, has implemented increased customer service training.


Housing & Homelessness: Make an attempt to establish more market rate housing downtown. Currently the downtown is comprised of 57% subsidized/government assisted housing. “Most of this was introduced with government funding in the mid & late 1960’s in a push to help the poor and homeless,” Housing Authority Mgr. Nestlerode said. “Do all cities have a housing authority?” an audience member asked. “No,” she said. The city would like to partner with non-profit partners to open ‘day-care’ centers where the homeless could go for rest and regrouping.


(Empty Building Ordinance and downtown empty building codes: A hot topic.)


The last topic drew the most controversy and uncovered little known tidbits and facts about the downtown. Image & Perception: LaVonne Salle (almost in tears) said that she had met with almost everyone at City Hall to implement the ‘Vacant Building codes.’ Code Enforcement Director Nimat then took center stage. “What folks don’t understand is that we have property maintenance codes # 7.54 and 7.62 or maybe it’s 7.60 – whatever it is, these codes state important things.” she offered. “We found out that owners with alleys behind their property are responsible to clean up to the middle of the alley. Before we had Public Works doing this job. Now we can ask the owners to become responsible,” she said. (Our question is, this woman has been Code Enforcement Director for many years in Vallejo, has she been hiding under a rock?) “We also have an ordinance in place that states that if you own a property downtown and have a pending work permit, even if that permit has been out for 10 years, you do not have to rent or make an attempt to rent your property. I did not make these rules up for these ordinances. That would be up to a City Council body to change these things. But that is what they currently say,” she said.

 

B.J. Lipari, Manager of the Empress Theatre, asked the following question: “There is a property right now on Georgia Street that has been boarded up for the last ten months that I have been here. Why aren’t you in Code Enforcement citing them or fining them?” he queried. (That would be 315 Georgia Street, and the guy has had an interior work permit for several years now) “There is language in the current ordinance that separates two words: ‘Blight’ vs. ‘Nuisance.’ If you read it you will see that boarded windows are blight, but not a nuisance. A nuisance would be drug activity, torn awnings, broken windows where someone can get hurt, etc. For example, there are two properties that are a big problem for me right now,” Grantham continued. “They are on Branciforte St. They have broken walls and broken windows. The owner read the ordinance and learned that as long as he boarded things over, he was good to go. So that is what he did, and I can do nothing more. If he did not do so, once noticed, I could drastically fine him, but he carefully read the material in the codes, and any court would agree,” she said. “We have a court vs. stick approach concerning codes. There are rules and incentives, and the court follows city code religiously,” she said.


Some have suggested that Code Enforcement Director, Nimat Shakoor Grantham has been actively conducting ‘Malicious Prosecution,’ Natasha Clark was charged and fined $400 a day for trumped up violations in her business. (Natasha is a very forthright, assertive European who can easily be misinterpreted). Also, long-time activist Myrna Hayes has been fine exorbitantly because Nimat is a good friend of her neighbor. There are many other examples of this selective prosecution out there.


The police representative once again reminded the audience that loitering, per se, is not a crime.

But if you see active prostitution, drinking in public, playing dice, or something of a criminal nature, by all means call us and we’ll cite the person,” he said. The owner of Ozcat radio said that he was shut down from his business on Georgia St. because the city demanded that his business be residential. He had to leave and announced that he would be opening up soon at 600 Marin Street. “I am here tonight to ask the city to cooperate with me and give me no further hassles with my business here in Vallejo. I like Vallejo, and like being here, but if I am given a lot of grief again, I will have to think twice,” he said. (The city has been known to bother people they take issue with – again ‘Malicious Prosecution). Longtime downtown property owner Jerry Grulke implored people to have a good attitude and get involved with their town. His message was delivered quite nicely through a poem he read. (Singing to the choir there, aren’t you Jerry?) Vallejo activist Kristina Naughton asked that the downtown area have consistency in what is placed downtown, similar lights, similar benches, etc.


We need to see a cohesive, unified look throughout downtown,” Naughton said. Long-time educator Vallejoan Monica Tipton praised city staff for their tremendous caring, work and involvement. (We have the new City Manager, Mr. Keen, to thank for their concerted efforts Miss Monica). Omar Latorre of the Vallejo Historical Museum spoke boldly, correctly and passionately about the many indigent souls who defecate throughout the downtown on a daily basis. “I have to clean it up around the museum everyday,” he said. “Also is there some kind of directory that will give vital stats, and information about an area before people open a business here?” The Economic Development Director told him that she was implementing a new web device which would facilitate that. (Let’s just hope that the 57% subsidized residents don’t scare them all away before they give Vallejo a chance.) Downtown business owner Lavonne LaSalle once again announced her imminent departure due to lack of business downtown. “I am leaving for Oregon soon,” she said. (Jerry Grulke who sold most of his Vallejo property to literally buy a little town in Oregon, gave Lavonne a deal she cannot refuse. She will be moving to his little northern Utopia.)


The new Planning Commissioner Tony Adams was the only city appointed official spotted in the audience; no current city council members were present. Convention & Visitors Center Director Mr. Mike Browne was also in attendance. Timelines from three to six months were given in order to implement some of the above stated plans of improvement. The jury is still out, but we’ll keep you posted as things hopefully progress.

 

9/3/12 correction courtesy know vallejo: Tony Adams is an appointed official, not elected

 

Comments
Add New Search RSS
Jerry Grulkey   |November.27.2012
Myrna has done alot for Vallejo. Spent thousands of hours trying to follow her passion. If you truly want a better place to live why not lend a hand to help her, this is what true community is all about. There's a Hank williams song which goes something like this..."At tongue can acuse and carry bad news, the seeds of destruct it will sew. But unless you've made no mistakes in you life be careful of stones that you throw!"
Jerry Grulkey   |November.27.2012
Here is to the coward who thinks ill of me. Vallejo is full of them and that is why LaVon is moving to a better world. If you are going to be critical do not hide behind a mask. Try looking in a mirror and you will find the "WHACKO" is staring back at you. My 40 year plus record in town stands alone (much of which you and others never knew I was behind, conforming to my Hicksite following) and I will miss many of my good friends here and the rest...well they are the problem as to why we have no community.
I'll be in my Oregon Town with the real "Artists" I have invited to
join me and never ever look back.

Note: My name is Jerry not Gerry. If you truly knew me you'd know that.
re subsidized housing   |September.05.2012
I may have misspoke about the City's contract w/ Napa. Ignore my earlier comment on this 'til I have more info.
Too much subsidized housing   |September.05.2012
One big thing that could help Vallejo overall, and downtown in particular is to put a moratorium on any new housing subsidies, and start twilighting some of the existing ones. If 57% of the rentals downtown are subsidized, that's too many units in a concentrated area. It's economic segregation, AND welfare for landlords -- and it's bad for Vallejo.

As a whole, Vallejo has too many subsidized housing units relative to its overall housing market. Plus, Vallejo needs a policy about how many units can be subsidized in town overall, in various areas, and in various complexes.

I don't know
what a healthy ratio is, but offhand, if you have more than 20% of your housing subsidized in any area, that can't be good for creating a balanced and vibrant community.

Guess what I found yesterday in poking around the Housing Authority's back meeting reports? Not only does Vallejo have its own low-income residents, but it has a contract with the City of Napa to provide subsidized housing, here. Thank you, but I think we already have enough poverty, we don't need to import it. Napa should take care of its own, and Vallejo needs to start crawling back to balance.
Monica   |September.04.2012
Just to clarify: I thanked them for a clear and consistent process and for clarification of many of the most bothersome questions. It was a very distinct contrast from at least two other recent proposals that the department handled.
VHA-17   |September.04.2012
@Anonymous

I have no problem with sec.8. I am not against sec.8. We do need to help some of the less fortunate among us.

It is the proportion. The relentless push for more and more. The incompetence of the staff to manage it so those projects turn into cancer for our community. You advocated to give more mandate to VHA for slumlord problem, doesn't VHA have slumlords on its hand already and we are not seeing VHA doing anything effective? So scrtch that idea of more mandate.

Why do we need 400+ more rental units in downtown? With the push of keeping 17 people busy from VHA and Fed money
to landlord from outside, it is not hard to see 400+ units turn into more subsidized apartment.

67% subsidized housing around downtown is more than enough of our share.

If you want downtown to improve, then no more rental apartments.

Enough is Enough.
ANON   |September.04.2012
How about the old badge and pass building
at the corner of Wilson Ave and Tennesee
St, it has had not one lick of maintennence
since the City recieved it from the Navy
we should have let the Navy keep it! that facility would have made a great Art Studio conversion wich would have funded its up keep . It has been stripped to the bone and poses a huge fire hazard "talk about blight" the neibours should fine the COV per day for this dump . MI north end is another example of COV owned blight garbage and debris strew all over there is no excuse
with our uber high salaries and almost no
jobs for youth for this condition to exist . Once again misdirected resources
and lack of focus makes COV the largest
owner of blighted property the biggest
violater and should be fining itself .
Anonymous   |September.04.2012
@VHA-17 re: "What about other cities? They do not have a HA"

City of Fairfield, CA - Fairfield Housing Authority
http://www.fairfield.ca.gov/gov/depts/cr/programs/authority.asp

City of Vacaville, CA : Vacaville Housing Authority
www.ci.vacaville.ca.us/index.aspx?page=147

Housing Authority - City of Benicia, CA
http://www.ci.benicia.ca.us/index.asp?Type=B_BASIC&SEC=%7B168FD445-2697-4709-814D-126AA764BBCF%7D

...AND they all handle Section 8, according to their websites.
Malicious Prosecution   |September.04.2012
See how CE is helping COV.

When people have a real business to run and need to do some changes and do it legally, they were taken hostage by CE because they have a business to run. When people occupy a building downtown but have no business to run, no one was hassling them because they do not have a business to run anyway.

When a law abiding citizens trying to improve their house, they got loops to jump through just because they value their home and properties. While no body is doing anything on crime filled, squatter house.

Is this how CE works ?
VHA-17   |September.04.2012
re: VHA Staff has too narrow a mandate - they never report on the foreclosure problem and out-of-town "investment" buyers and slumlords.

Too narrow a mandate? The last thing we want to do is to give them more mandate.

What about other cities? They do not have a HA; how do they deal with their foreclosure problem and out-of-town "investment" buyers and slumlords.
? Maybe code enforcement's job?

With the existing culture of farming the poor/disadvantaged. The last thing we want to do is to make VHA take more on its plate.
Malicious Prosecution   |September.04.2012
@tramky

I understand Mare Island situation is bad. But I hope others will not use that to justify CE is not doing their job.

If the code is so bad and COV is the first that violates the code so we can not enforce CE on other areas then we might as well disband CE.
Malicious Prosecution   |September.04.2012
@Natasha Clarke

Thank you for clarifying.

I do not know you and have not used your service before; but while there are so many things that NEED to be code enforced and not and C.E. is picking on hard working business owner who is bringing some positive energy to downtown just made me mad.

Looking at COV org chart, the higher ups of C.E. are Community Development, Assistant city manager and city manager.
VHA-17   |September.04.2012
re: The City Council IS the VHA. They direct VHA Staff.

Am I missing something here? The CC can direct VHA? Is this the same as "CC can direct code enforcement" so CC is code enforcement?

I hate to see people hiding behind CC and staff is not taking any accountability for their bad recommendation.
Mad As Heck   |September.04.2012
HOW THE HECK DO YOU GET A CODE ENFORCEMENT FINE DISMISSED? I have seen numerous property owners suffer from nit picking code enforecment fines that were questionable at best. Some were told that the city is broke and they need the money.

I had previously blogged aout how a $280 fine turned into a $5000 fine because the city kept on saying I was "late" in paying it when I could show proof that I was not. Now you can get fines dismissed if someone likes you!

I have seen many fine property owners abandon Vallejo because of such. If what the previous blogger said is true then THIS
CITY CAN GOT TO HELL. DON'T ASK ME TO CONTRIBUTE ANYTHING TO IT OTHER THAN WHAT I HAVE TO!
Natasha Clarke   |September.04.2012
I would like to clarify something in regards to my experiences with Code Enforcement. Code E. is simply following the orders of those higher up. I found Nimat to be very understanding during the 2 years of my construction and renovation project which the City made me do. The City sent Nimat to fine me for not painting the exterior of my building. However, when she came to my building in person she quickly understood how much I had already done inside in order to comply with the City's other requests. So later she dismissed all my fines.
So my point is Code E department is simply following
orders.
Anonymous   |September.04.2012
Non code enforcement is also used as a tool by City Staff to make life absolutely miserable for any activist that starts pulling back the curtains on City staff's illegal activities. Like one of our neighbors who took a lead on the Callahan debacle. Next door to him is a crime filled, squatter house where City Hall won't enforce their own laws. Looks like they really want him to move away so they can do their dirty work in peace. No wonder people use anonymous as an avatar...otherwise they, too, would be the target of malicious code enforcement or non-code enforcement as the case may be.
Less Snarkiness Please   |September.04.2012
While I appreciate the fact that Hatfield Mccoy took the time to atten the meeting and put together this report, it would seem more appropriate to call it an opinion piece. It distracts from the actual facts and issues when the "report" is filled snarky comments and bias opinions. There is enough to discuss without the personal snarkiness.
Anonymous   |September.04.2012
@VHA-17 Of course you have to equate City Council with VHA. The City Council IS the VHA. They direct VHA Staff or supposed to direct VHA Staff what to do. What VHA/City Council needs to do is expand their mandate and direct VHA Staff to report on the foreclosure problems, and other related housing issues. Since VHA Staff works with Housing and Redevelopment Commission, VHA/City Council also needs to empower H&RC to look into those matters as well, so they can properly advise the City Council.
rocketman   |September.04.2012
It is well known that the large downtown building owner has been gaming the Code Enforcement system for years--he's probably bought it off in any event.

The single greatest problem with downtown was just blown off by the guy who said loitering is not a crime. THAT is the biggest problem with downtown--the denizens of downtown. We know who they are, we know what they look like, and we know what they do. And no one with any degree of sensibilities will go BACK to downtown once they get a load of the denizens of downtown; they define Vallejo for many people.

Downtown Vallejo is largely a
product of LBJ's War on Poverty, with its horrible urban renewal sinkholes all over this country. Vallejo apparently let itself become one of them. Sheer disaster. It killed downtowns all over the United States, many of which have never recovered. Vallejo is one, and continues to pay the price for sucking at the Federal breast for most of its existence as a City. The naval shipyard was always a two-edged sword, bringing large amounts of Federal money and all manner of commitments to Federal programs.

And now you have the result when all that Federal money walks away. It will take years
to get over it, if that is even possible. Here's the stark truth about downtown Vallejo. It is controlled, on the street, by loud, arrogant, sometimes in-your-face mostly black loiterers. They are there every day, yelling at each other across the street, hanging around in small groups, creating an atmosphere of--let's be honest about this--a kind of social intimidation. Their presence and their behaviors are intimidating. Until they're gone, downtown will suffer greatly from this.
tramky   |September.04.2012
Code enforcement?! Myrna Hayes' house--one house?! It's trivial.

The largest code violator in Vallejo is the City of Vallejo--just look at Mare Island north of G Street. Most of that derelict disaster is owned by the City of Vallejo--you know, the buildings with graffiti, broken windows, massive flaking paint, collapsed roofs, and the burned-down warehouse with the black timber posts still standing for 8 months & counting. Those buildings have been empty & going derelict for 16 years!

What is it?! Is Mare Island exempt from Code Enforcement. Oh, it must be City-owned buildings &
property that is exempt from Code Enforcement.
Malicious Prosecution   |September.04.2012
Sounds like there are so many problems in enforcing the code; this can not be done due to code, that can not be done due to code....all the reason why she can not do anything. So why are we keeping Code Enforcement Director Nimat ? and what does she do?

With so many places that needs code enforcement that are not tend to and they were harassing business owner like Natasha? If this is not Malicious Prosecution, what is it?
VHA-17   |September.04.2012
Let us not equate VHA to City Council. Every city has a city council but not every city has a HA.

When you have 17 people on the payroll, you need to find jobs to keep them busy and what is better than having ANOTHER subsidized housing project.(as recently proposed 400+ units) .DO I want to hire 17 people to service homeless and subsidized rental if it is my money? No.

Looking at all the services we (the non-subsidized citizens) need and do not have, 17 is too great a number.

VHA needs to be smaller.
Anonymous   |September.04.2012
@VHA-17 VHA (aka City Council) and VHA Staff has too narrow a mandate - they never report on the foreclosure problem and out-of-town "investment" buyers and slumlords. This should be mandatory in VHA meetings.
Anonymous   |September.03.2012
When you look at the "Projects" all around downtown, many of them are 90% subsidized, 57% is way too low a number. I like to see how they come up with this number.
VHA -17   |September.03.2012
"Do all cities have a housing authority? an audience member asked.

Housing Authority Mgr. Nestlerode said "No."

From the last salary report, we have 17 - Seventeen people on VHA payroll. That is the reason we have relentless push for more subsidized housing.

Don't be confused that Nestlerode is interested in revitalizing downtown. Nestlerode is interested in getting more subsidized housing to keep all 17 people busy and employed.

Vallejo is short on money, we need to reexamine how much we want to spend on VHA.
Anonymous   |September.03.2012
Am I missing something? Why are you guys/gals gang up on Myrna Hayes re: her house?

I do not know her or any one of you but I know where her house is. It is not the best kept in the neighborhood but I sure have seen worse than hers.

The one on the corner of Tennessee and Santa Clara with fire damaged roof is not too far from hers and nobody is complaining about it?
Mousy   |September.03.2012
Sounds like we need an updated ordinance with a time limit for renovations. Say 2 years. After that they start getting fined.
Anonymous   |September.03.2012
It seems like staff is saying they're going to make these changes (codes, etc.) but isn't it the Council who makes those decisions? "City staffers are going to consider reduced fees..." When did staff get elected?

I was also at this meeting and Reynosa even snarked to a question about bringing jobs to Vallejo that she had tried, but the Council voted down her recommended project the night before (Callahan's scam) that would have brought a lot of jobs to Vallejo. Who does this woman work for? For the past two weeks she seemed to be Joe Callahan's hired hand, and now she's changing city
codes, reducing fees and criticizing council decisions.

And I agree with other posts. Myrna Hayes' house is a complete wreck, one massive code violation. My question isn't why Nimat S-G is allegedly going after Myrna's code violations. My question is why the hell has the city let Myrna get away with this garbage pit for so long? Who at City Hall is protecting her and why?

And finally, Gerry Grulkey? He's a complete wacko. Sorry to see the Barbie lady get involved with him. At least it won't be in Vallejo!
Anonymous   |September.03.2012
I'm in agreement re: Myrna Hayes. Her house is a complete disaster and a health & safety hazard. Don't complain if city is going after her as they rightly should. What you should do instead is set up a work party with her friends and fix the mess.
Anonymous   |September.03.2012
Luna-Reynosa says a downtown needs a certain amount of people and yet she wanted to put an office building on the waterfront... One story to one group, one to another... And what about the Triad lawsuit?
know vallejo   |September.03.2012
if i were myrna haye's neighbor, i'd sell my house. have you ever seen myrna's property? it's literally a dump. i'll bet you wouldn't tolerate it next door to you, paula.
BTW. tony adams isn't an elected official. he's appointed by a majority of the council.
Write comment
Name:
 
:angry::0:confused::cheer:B):evil::silly::dry::lol::kiss::D:pinch:
:(:shock::X:side::):P:unsure::woohoo::huh::whistle:;):s
 
Please input the anti-spam code that you can read in the image.

3.23 Copyright (C) 2007 Alain Georgette / Copyright (C) 2006 Frantisek Hliva. All rights reserved."