Up Next: Father Lou Bordisso interviews Joe Jones, candidate for Solano

 County Superintendent of Schools.


5/2/10--The following press release was sent to VIB from YES ON A 

a_signs.jpgYes on Measure A Proponents

 Rely on People-Power to Get the

 Message Out

 

Vallejo, California – What do 30 volunteers, five gallons of paint, dozens of squares of plywood, and hundreds of sheets of poster board get? Yes on Measure A.


With no outside or special interest funding, Vallejo citizens and taxpayers have gone grassroots to paint and silkscreen signs encouraging their fellow citizens to vote yes on Measure A. The signs will sprout up all over Vallejo this weekend.

 

Jim Libien, Citizens for Vallejo Co-Chair, said, “It would have been a lot easier to throw money at a professional print shop to create our signs like our opponents in the police and firefighter unions did. But we don’t have that luxury. Our signs aren’t perfect, we didn’t always paint within the lines, but they get the critical message across – Vallejo citizens and taxpayers support Yes on A.”

 

I want to be a part of the solution to save Vallejo from fiscal inertia. To do that, Measure A has got to be approved by the voters. Even though I don't have a lot of money, I do have some time, so I volunteered to paint signs for two Weekends,” explained Glen Cove resident Karol Heppe.


As Paul Norberg of Hiddenbrooke described, “Just look at the campaign signs of the two sides of Measure A.a_signs_group.jpg The Yes on A signs are homegrown. They were created by hand by Vallejo citizens. Our opposition’s signs are slick and expensive because they can afford it as they have big union dollars backing them.”

Yes on A will level the playing field and put taxpayers back in the driver’s seat, not big special interest money. It’s all about re-establishing local control,” said Denise Martin, a South Vallejo resident.


For more information on Yes on A, visit www.citizensforvallejo.org.

Comments
Add New Search RSS
Magic thinking   |May.05.2010
...never works. Why don't you suggest that the City of Vallejo buy bunches of lottery tickets every week? The Marines are not coming to save us. Get it. The only thing that will is providing an economic climate that fosters small businesses and start ups. Vallejo PSU problems have made us a black hole in the middle of the strongest economic powerhouse on the globe...runs from Silicon Vallejo up to Davis to Napa Vallejo to Livermore. See what happens when uneducated, selfish, myopic people control things?
Someone Else   |May.05.2010
What, so Vallejo needs a sugar daddy in order to prosper?

So let's see what the new sugar daddies have done: Lennar is bankrupt and blocks the economic development of Mare Island. Triad is bankrupt and has yet to turn a shovel downtown. Big box stores leave big vacancies and drag shopping centers down with them.

Sugar daddy entities, be it the military or corporations, can't be solely relied on for Vallejo's economic development. We've got to expand our economy across a broad spectrum industries, with a healthy mix of retail thrown in. So far this city hasn't prooved capable of
managing individuals wanting to invest.

Oh, and the police did not give up their right to strike in exchanged for BA. The state passed a law making PS strikes illegal, after Vallejo's BA agreement was already on the books. BA only passed because of a police strike.
Mr :)   |May.05.2010
I am not sure what the consequences are, but in theory police gave up the right to strike and other job actions in exchange for binding arbitration.

Sorry about going off topic on the marine base, but the reality is Vallejo needs federal kind of $.
Mr :)   |May.05.2010
Forget military: Reagan is not president any more, and the Okinawans are just going to get more and more belligerent until there are constant confrontations and disruptions.

I suggest dropping the Trader Joe's idea and start working on the Marines.
Living in Oz   |May.05.2010
YES on Measure A. I want my roads fixed.
Living in Oz   |May.05.2010
Removing Binding Arbitration is not unfair to any worker in Vallejo and to say so is a misrepresentation of reality. I had to respond to Warped about his/her problem with the photo. Removing Binding Arbitration from the City Charter is NOT unfair to employees. State law protects employee's rights and 95% of the cities in California and about the same percentage of counties follow state law, under which binding arbitration - decided by an outside arbitrator - is unconstitutional. The Cities and Counties that follow State law protects the rights of all of the police and fire fighters - all
of whom receive more than fair, marketable salaries, and are able to negotiate contracts in good faith, keep their jobs, and work in cities that do not spend 80% of their general funds on police and fire salaries, benefits and pensions. KEEPING Binding Arbitration, on the other hand is HARMFUL to the citizens of Vallejo. All money that comes in goes to paying the salaries of police and fire (almost 80% of the general fund) because of their VERY HIGH salaries, overtime, benefit packages and retirment benefits of 3% at 50.
Forget military   |May.04.2010
In Okinawa there are 5 bases, and they will be there as long as China exists. (They're closer to China than Japan mainland actually). Do you know that we don't have bases because Reagan closed all bases in the Bay Area? He hated us, as we hated him. It was an economic punishment, though. But look Concord, and many other places have closed their bases and they have done more than fine.
By the way, I'll vote yes on A
Hmmm....   |May.04.2010
That "hint, hint" comment is really snarky. It condescendingly suggests that Vallejoans are untrained and unskilled so any low wage jobs are good enough. Obviously you don't live here. Most Vallejoans I know have usable professional degrees, proven skill sets and a whole bunch of experience that command good salaries from companies located and paying taxes in other communities because the cost and hassle factor of doing business in Vallejo is not worth it. I am talking about the UUT tax, special assessment districts, Mello-Roos districts, and exorbitant permit fees that are needed to
feed the PSU machine. Get real, the US base in Okinawa is there because of its strategic location; it will never be moved to anywhere on the West Coast of the continental US. Vallejo can never increase revenues through any means that will be enough to satisfy the PSUs.
On Fire   |May.04.2010
avatar Say wha? I've lived here over twenty five years. I think that disqualifies me as a newby. In the last twenty years I have watched both sides and while there is plenty of blame to go around, I would say the newest Vallejoans have a fresh prospective because they have come from other cities and see things a little differently than those who have been here for years. Vallejo never quite learned how to take those training wheels off since the Navy kept running along side of the bike, holding it up and making the ride easy. So the city has pretty much done things in the same way since the Navy was
here and a lot of people have a hard time adjusting to change. We have let the unions have their binding arbitration for the last thirty plus years and now it's time to try something new. They have had the comfort and security of being well compensated and pretty much directing how the city should be run. I think that has been a fair chunk of time and it hasn't been working for so well for the citizens. If we are going to be obligated to pay into eternity for retirement and health benefits for the long gone employees as well as the salaries of the current employees, I'd like to get a little
more return for my money.

Now lets see how things go when the taxpayers take over and ride this bike, free style. Change is good. Yes on A.
Curious   |May.04.2010
Now the PSUs are using the sniffly "can't we all get along" whine after they have bloodied our noses repeatedly? The PSUs made a strategic decision to leave Vallejo in ashes if they did not get their way so good citizens started to organize to take our community back. Then the PSUs start whining. Usual bully response.
Mr :)   |May.04.2010
Can't we all just get along? Instead of fighting each other why not work on a common mutually beneficial goal. Bringing the US Marines from Okinawa, where the stuck up Japanese don't want them, to Vallejo where they will be loved or at least served in all restaurants. I suspect 50,000 US military plus an equal number or more support jobs(*) would fix a lot of things.

* Many would be US federal government jobs requiring minimal qualifications. Hint hint.
S. Martin   |May.04.2010
I guess the PSUers who are studying the photo on this page to see who they know must be confused. They don't understand people who aren't afraid to own up to their free speech. They're used to making their nasty signs and putting them out in the dead of night, concealed in black clothes.
Anonymous   |May.03.2010
How about Yes on Measure A -- don't listen to the greedy words of our PSUs who have never lived here, let alone for very long. They just want to take your money and run to their affluent home towns.
Say Wha?   |May.03.2010
Ever notice some people are always just searching for a cause.....no matter what it is.

"Yes on Measure A??? Ok, I don't get it and I've only live in Vallejo for 3 years but I hate the police too, so I'll join in! Don't taze me bro"

No on Measure A, please don't listen to the warped minds of a few Vallejoians most of whom haven't lived here very long......oh, ouch no ever really talks about that, huh : (
Warped   |May.03.2010
Unwarped is very angry about his 401K or lack there of. Also, I understand your comments about the private sector, ect. That is fine, however I guess we should all make the same salaries in America and everyone will live in peace and harmony.....that's called communism.

Sorry if any of my posts came across as I was having any type of tantrum/breakdown, because I am not. I simply capitalized certain words in order to emphasize my points in the written word. I just wanted to have a little constructive dialog about the issue of binding arbitration, so as to see/hear it from another
perspective. It is obvious now that is not likely to happen here and I've hit some nerves, so you won't hear from me again.

Unwarped wrote:
"F your contract, I don't care if you all leave...."

--Pretty much says it all.
On Fire   |May.03.2010
avatar Warped, you haven't answered the question. I am well award of what BA is for and how it is supposed to be used. But your unions say they haven't had to use it. So how did they end up with some of the highest paid compenssation packages in the State?

If BA is such a good thing, why did the Courts rule it to be unconstitutional and why do the majority of California cities get through their contract negotiatiions without "being tied up in court" like the unions claim we would be? So as I said, the sound bites that the unions keep feeding to the citizens just don't make sense. The
usually union partial Chamber of Commerce have come out in support of Measure A. They apparently know that the union strangle hold over the city needs to change.

We all want a well compensated police and fire. Everybody does. But not at the cost of bankrupting the city and giving up all other services. The only way that this will happen, is to stop letting the unions run our town. The city needs to start operating to provide quality services to the tax payers instead of operating as an employment agency that provides and maintains the highest paying jobs and employment opportunites.
Anything less just doesn't make sense.
Yes in A   |May.03.2010
I love the PSUers tantrums. What, you don't like that our council members and the others are enjoying their work to save Vallejo? You didn't have as much fun with your ugly, angry signs? I bet yours cost a lot more money, too. Sucks for you.

I love the smiles of the people in the photo combined with the sweat of honest labor. Good job everyone! They look great. YES on A!
Anonymous   |May.03.2010
What does starting a business have to do with anything? Who else on Council has? Hannigan? No. Wilson? No. Sunga? No. Schivley? No. Davis? Yes, a law practice.�

You don't have to own a business to understand what's good for business.
Equals   |May.03.2010
Warped is having a bit of a breakdown/temper tantrum. Just ignore his posts until his meds kick in. Consider it the death throes of the way we USED to do things around here.

Yes on A!
Unwarped   |May.03.2010


I'll be lucky if my 401K is worth the amount I paid into it when I retire at 90, and I'll be damned if I see you drain our tax coffers for your golden retirement. This city can't even afford to support our elderly anymore-many who subsist on social security alone.

Here's a BIG middle finger to you.
F your contract.

And as far as BA leveling the playing field? I'd like to see it continue to be unlevel, but this time tipped towards council and the taxpayers of Vallejo they represent.

The difference between Private Corps & Muni Governments that face Bankruptcy is that
its difficult to impossible for a city to close its doors like a bankrupt private company that has no hope of survival.

Union members of most struggling private companies have gladly opened their contracts and given up a lot, since they know its the difference between a job and no job.

Public Safety Unions see that flow of tax dollars as all theirs and if its not enough, screw granny and us other poor saps, make us pay more in taxes, find some whore politicians (we have a few on council) who will do your bidding.

I'll say it again:
F your contract. I don't care if you all leave, I
have a gun and a pretty good security system.
Firebug   |May.03.2010
avatar What a concept warped the employer having control over their employees.
Warped   |May.03.2010
I am happy to answer that Unwarpped. I know you are probably familiar with contract negotiations process. Since you are, you know that when two parties have the inability to agree there sometimes comes a time when an outside party may have to make that decision. What is so WRONG with having an unbiased third party make a FAIR decision during negotiations? I'll tell you what is WRONG with it....the city want total control over what its employees are paid regardless of fairness. The city does not want to be FAIR to their employees, they want CONTROL that is all this measure A is
about.....CONTROL. That is called a Totalitarianism form of government. If anyone argues Measure A is not about control they are not being truthful.

Some agree with that idea, some don't....I personally don't. If the city could pay every police officer and fire fighter WHATEVER they wanted without recourse, what do you think it would be?? Probably far less than other people doing the very same job other places in the bay area. That's why I don't blame people for leaving for other employment.

Many say BA "levels the playing field", and I disagree it does nothing of the sort. It
allows total control by city, how is that level? I feel more and more CUTS will not be good for Vallejo in the long run.
A neighbor   |May.03.2010
This is an outstanding initiative. Keep up the good job. I'll also help.
On Fire   |May.03.2010
avatar So Warped, are you saying that binding arbitration is the only mechanism that insured the city employees would be treated fairly! Have you ever wondered about how the other 400 plus cities are able to attract and keep their work force? Surely you don't think that they hate their employees because they don't have binding arbitration?

That makes no sense. And I will tell you something else that makes no sense. The unions have repeatedly stated that they have only used binding arbitration a handful of times. So why are they fighting so hard to keep it? I mean, if I have things around my house
that are useless, they go into the trash. Why keep it? Just in case? So that I can pull it out every ten years or so and see if I have found a use for it now?

Now if you believe what the unions have been telling you, and you take into consideration the fact that our employees have been able to enjoy one of the highest compensation packages in California for years, can you explain how that happened? Why keep it if it hasn't been useful? The first thing they say to you is that they got their contracts for the most part, without ever having to use BA. They say that they didn't have to twist
any arms, or threaten anyone because the Council had willingly agreed to it.

So why then, if you believe what they are telling you, are they fighting so very hard, to keep it?
Dark Knight   |May.03.2010
Who do I contact if we would like to place one of these signs on our property? I live at a busy intersection off of Ascot and don't mind supporting this cause.
Unwarpped   |May.03.2010
Binding "interest" Arbitration is ILLEGAL for deciding contracts in almost all CA cities. Why? Because it takes away taxpayers rights. It must be abolished.

I voted for council members to decide how my taxe dollars are spent NOT some arbitrator from Marin or Wisconsin.

And when an employee can put in $400K over 30 years of work, retire at 50 and then take out $4 million in pension payments (CALpers estimated public safety lives til the average age of 81, same as everyone else), something is really wrong. The system will collapse because the taxpayers can't even afford to
support these insane pensions.


YES ON A YES ON A
Warped   |May.03.2010
Firebug,

You are not answering my question. I am not sure you want to........?
Firebug   |May.03.2010
avatar "warped" because no matter how much revenue we have ever had come in the last 11 years I have lived here consistently 3/4 of it went to fund public safety only. To get back the $20,000,000 we have lost will require bringing in 50 Walmarts 20,000,000/400,000 = 50 and that is when 80 percent went to public safety only.
Anonymous   |May.03.2010
So Stephanie Gomes and Marti Brown - elected officials - are "HAPPY" to reveal themselves to be against City workers. IF Gomes and Brown had put just as much energy into attracting new businesses into Vallejo so Vallejo has tax revenues coming in, there would be more monies in the General Fund for the City in the first place. So where is the PRO-BUSINESS plan for Vallejo, Gomes and Brown? Do the both of you gals even know how to start and run a business? Oh yeah, that's right, both of your "jobs" are working for the Government pulling down six-figure salaries
yourselves!!!!!
Warped   |May.03.2010
Firebug,

Why does it have to be one or the other? Can workers not have/maintain rights and still serve their customers (ie. citizens in this case)???
Firebug   |May.03.2010
avatar You are indeed "warped" what an upside down world we live in where workers rights matter more than those they serve.
Hmmm....   |May.03.2010
Yes on Measure A!

Support the rights of the community and fairness to the citizens that pay taxes!

So will all those folks in the photograph be added to the PSU no-response list?
Warped   |May.03.2010
This group photo is very disturbing to me..... I understand the depth of the financial situation in the city and am for concessions to get through tough times just as much as the next person, I get that. But to see such happiness and hardwork put into a cause that fight to takes away workers rights, is so strange to me. I feel it is truly a warped sense of whats right and wrong.

I just wish as much hard work, "grassroots" effort could be put into generating revenue and courting business and industry to Vallejo. It is for these reason, I feel most yes on A proponents' motivation
stems from their dislike for the police (of course they would never admit this). That is just my opinion.

I respect others opinions, but still don't feel more CUTS will ever lead to a BETTER VALLEJO long term. It is truly a social experiment, I am not willing to participate in.

NO on Measure A - Support workers rights and fairness to city employees.
Sign Sign   |May.03.2010
Great job Yes on A people! I saw some driving around - they look beautiful!
YesOnA   |May.02.2010
Wow! Those signs look great. Reminds me of LNG days. Amazing things can be done grassroots. We'll prove it on June 8. YES on A! Viva Vallejo!
Citizens for Vallejo   |May.02.2010
To Fantastic --
We'd LOVE to have help - please email

info@citizensforvallejo.net

with your info -- or stop by Farmers Market next Saturday (corner of Georgia & Marin) we will have a booth there every Saturday until the election.

We have LOTS of volunteer opportunities, Thank you!!!
Fantastic!   |May.02.2010
Thank you all for your hard work and contributions to this effort. Money is coming your way from our household. If we want to work the phones or go door-to-door, who do we email?

Those slick, angry signs opposing Measure A were not printed by a Vallejo shop I would bet. Just like that faux-magazine that VPOA poops out (how amateur!) is probably not printed in town.

Viva Vallejo and Hell Yes on Measure A!
Vallejoan   |May.02.2010
Great signs

Thanks folks for what you are doing.
Write comment
Name:
 
:angry::0:confused::cheer:B):evil::silly::dry::lol::kiss::D:pinch:
:(:shock::X:side::):P:unsure::woohoo::huh::whistle:;):s
 
Please input the anti-spam code that you can read in the image.

3.23 Copyright (C) 2007 Alain Georgette / Copyright (C) 2006 Frantisek Hliva. All rights reserved."

 
  1. pintarbersamamedan.org
  2. https://pintarbersamamanado.org
  3. https://pintarbersamasorong.org/dana
  4. HK LOTTO
  5. GenerasiTOGEL
  6. TOGEL
  7. TOGEL HONGKONG
  8. TOGEL
  9. https://elk-mountain.com/
  10. data sdy