Does Your Vote Matter-Redux?
By Katy Miessner
Posted 01/24/2008
|
Or,
An-ar-chy in the counting-room!
If
you are concerned, please get involved!
ADQ
might be a disco-queen but on occasion has been known to listen to
some punk-rock (no slam dancing or mosh pits, though-yuk!).
The Sex Pistols' "Anarchy in the UK" can be this
election's motto; just substitute "UK" with
"Counting Room." This includes the rooms where the voting
machines were, and the rooms where the hand-counts took place. Each
had its own version of anarchy.
Last
night, January 23, the level of anarchy became even more apparent
during a Q&A with the Solano County Registrar of Voters, Ira
Rosenthal, and the Assistant Registrar, Lindsey McWilliams. The
Solano County Central Committee
hosted this Q&A at their monthly meeting.
The
Q&A, intended to be general, started off with some general
questions but as soon as the first question about the Vallejo Mayoral
Election was lobbed, the discussion was all about that. Rosenthal
and McWilliams appeared evasive, gave contradictory and/or unclear
information and the result was that the entire process is more
suspect than ever.
And-whoa-on
top of what we already know, a trashed ballot; another vote "found"
during a "secret" recount; etc, etc, we discover:
-
Mr.
McWilliams stated that "marks" invalidate ballots,
including identifying marks, correction marks and signatures (the
only signature that is acceptable for an absentee ballot is the one
on the mailing envelope).
I
argued this point with McWilliams on Tuesday Dec 4th. I
basically said the same thing: absentee ballots that have been marked
up (and there were plenty, including several that I saw with
signatures on them) should be disqualified. But on Dec 4th,
McWilliams told me something entirely different; that ballots with
marks & signatures are OK, as long as "voter intent"
can be determined.
My
recount group spotted several ballots that were signed. The group
just sort of thought it was quaint or endearing that someone would
sign their ballot.
The
Registrar then left it up to one of the Hiddenbrooke Neighborhood
Associations to get the word out that there would be a polling place
in Hiddenbrooke, because the Hiddenbrooke precinct was not sent the
"vote by mail" ballots that normally go with the
"flagged" message. McWilliams indicated that sending
these would be too expensive. Instead, the association was asked to
send an email (hope they weren't recognized as spam!) to
residents. The result was that there was much confusion within the
Hiddenbrooke community about voting, and because that precinct
consisted of a majority of Cloutier supporters, the Registrar's
error most likely inordinately impacted Cloutier's campaign.
The
Hiddenbrooke polls closed early, and not directly related to this,
but McWilliams did say that poll workers don't like working at
Hiddenbrooke because the gates close at a certain time. The audience
corrected McWilliams: Hiddenbrooke does not even have gates that
close.
-
They
were asked if observers touched the ballots and McWilliams responded
with a resounding no, and that there are no exceptions.
Uh-oh: I mentioned to him and the other attendees that a recount
election board member passed me a ballot that I wanted to challenge.
There wasn't anyone in the room (as there should have been)
from the Registrar's Office to say that I shouldn't
touch it, but I immediately put it down, thinking that it was very
odd that I would even be handed a ballot.
-
They
were asked about rules and training and if any materials were handed
out. Rosenthal said that there were materials "available on
the Secretary of State's web site." Apparently there was
no direct training of the observers, at least not me, or the recount
election board. This was especially illustrated by the fact that a
recount board member handed me a ballot: A big "no-no."
-
Brent
Turner from the San
Francisco Election Integrity League
in response to the many problems with the machines, including
display of "cryptic messages" (the registrar's own
words) and counting ballots that should not have been counted,
described problems with Solano County's voting machines that
result from not having "open-source code."
Open-source
code describes a machine which has programming that is accessible to
anyone in the Registrar's office. The current problem with our
machines, manufactured by ES&S (who was recently sued
by the State of California) is that their code is their "intellectual
property" and what they make their profits from. So the code
is closed, that is, only the vendor understands and has access to it.
So, when something goes wrong, like cryptic messages or ballots
erroneously counted twice, only the vendor can fix it or address it!
As the Open
Voting Consortium
states, the entire voting system must be open to complete public
scrutiny with no "trade secrets."
For
Solano County specifically, the Registrar has asked ES&S for
additional training regarding the "cryptic error message"
which won't be scheduled until after the February primary!
HELLO? We are going into the most critical primary in California's
history: we will actually have quite an influence in both the
Democratic and Republican races, and we will be using machines that
spit out "cryptic messages." "We're
so sorry Mr./Ms. [insert candidate name] that you lost but we can't
tell you why because the message was cryptic..."
After
the meeting, after hearing all the election blunders, especially with
the machine count and the recount, Turner came up with the
description "anarchy in the counting-room!"
-
Supervisor
Kondylis suggested the idea of creating an Election Advisory
Committee, as she did at Tuesday's
Board of Supervisor's meeting.
It was received like a lead balloon by Rosenthal and McWilliams.
They obviously wanted nothing to do with such a committee and only
discussed reasons why there should not be one.
-
The
idea was then discussed about creating a citizen's group-one
that would be created outside of the Board of Supes and/or the
Registrar's Office. The Registrar was quite resistant and
indicated that the viewing room could only accommodate 8-10 people
and any group would have to be limited, and that they already have
observers totaling about that amount: reps from various groups
including the Democratic Central Committee.
Rosenthal
and McWilliams are actually quite incorrect on this point. Turner
from the San Francisco Election Integrity League said that the
Registrar must accommodate any citizen that requests to observe the
vote-counting. After the meeting, we all speculated that within that
brand-spanking new County Center, they must have some space
somewhere. Maybe in that fabulous and gigantic lobby?
If
you are interested in contributing, or are interested in what
happened and how you can help make sure it never happens again,
please attend this important meeting hosted by Gary Cloutier:
Election
Results Meeting hosted by Gary Cloutier
When:
Sunday, January 27, 2008 at 4:00 pm
Where:
733 Tennessee Street, Rick Mariani's photography studio
With
the confusion about the election and contest, Cloutier
believes it is necessary hold a public meeting to discuss what he
knows about the election results and explain the necessity for the
contest. Cloutier has sent a letter to every household in Vallejo
which voted in the last election, inviting them to attend.
The
meeting will be a forum to discuss the election and
contest. Supervisor Kondylis will be there as well as possibly a
staff member from the Secretary of State's Office
|
BREAKING NEWS !! # 103 Sawyer street multiple gun-shots a Victim has been shot with mutiple Bulle...
Update on the 2009 bankruptcy. Pritchard had a previous bankruptcy that did not solve the proble...
Wow Silas ! seems you have had some strong coffee today .. Keep in mind when the Arsenal closed i...
@Anonymous, That has always been a good question. About 15 years ago we started to have an in...
I'm curious, has the city ever thought to solicit Silicon Valley start ups or established IT busi...